Live data from Hacker News

“Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

bbc.com

21–30 of 47 posts

Re: “Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

#21
post #9

> "The whole thing is a mess - a terrible example of junk science hitting the internet in free-fall," wrote Dr David Stuart Wouldn't it actually be an excellent example of 'junk science hitting the internet in free-fall' ?

"I'm in terrible pain."

"This is an excellent example of excruciating pain". The "terrible" in "terrible example of X" means that it's a bad example of X, not that it's a good example of how X is bad.

Re: “Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

#22

You can see it on google maps using these co-ords (4.20, -4.20)

The coordinates you posted point to the sea off the coast of Cote d'Ivoire... The actual coordinates are these: 17.9447247, -90.1666302 And by the way, I also noticed that no news outlet seems to even bother to post the coordinates.

Perhaps you missed the reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/420_(cannabis_culture)

Re: “Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

#24
post #9

> "The whole thing is a mess - a terrible example of junk science hitting the internet in free-fall," wrote Dr David Stuart Wouldn't it actually be an excellent example of 'junk science hitting the internet in free-fall' ?

An example can be 'terrible' in many ways

Re: “Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

#25
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"I'm in terrible pain."

"This is an excellent example of excruciating pain". The "terrible" in "terrible example of X" means that it's a bad example of X, not that it's a good example of how X is bad.

When we're talking about something a person did (promoting junk science, in this case), it's easy to use the meaning of setting a bad example. It's usually clear from context whether the example is 'terrible to follow' or 'terrible at explicating'.

You might prefer a nonambiguous wording, but the current wording is valid, and not a grammatical error.

For the pain example, think of "a terrible example of how to excruciatingly injure yourself" as a phrase that's easier to use in either context.

Re: “Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

#26

You could literally throw a dart at a map of the Yucatan/Northern Central America and it would land on an "Ancient Mayan city". I grew up there, and our house was built on top of Maya ruins, we'd find hundreds of ruins in the surrounding mountains. We used to dig up full ceramic bowls and a ton of obsidian in the garden. The hype around this kid is amazing.

I'm Mexican and i can confirm this. The south is full of "undiscovered" pyramids. There are in certain regions tons of fake mountains. And even in mexico city you just need to digg a little bit in certain places to find artifacts and art. There is just not enough funding in archeology, and once "discovered" its expensive to take care of them. Which is a shame really because there are tons of things we dont know about this civilizations. Precolombian history is full of speculations.

Re: “Ancient Mayan city” discovered by teen may in fact be cannabis crop

#27
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"This is an excellent example of excruciating pain". The "terrible" in "terrible example of X" means that it's a bad example of X, not that it's a good example of how X is bad.

When we're talking about something a person did (promoting junk science, in this case), it's easy to use the meaning of setting a bad example. It's usually clear from context whether the example is 'terrible to follow' or 'terrible at explicating'. You might prefer a nonambiguous wording, but the current wording is valid, and not a grammatical error. For the pain example, think of "a terrible example of how to excruc…

Thanks for explaining. I hadn't meant to point it out in a sense of grammatical correctness but it makes sense that way.
Post reply on HN