Earlier quoted context omitted.
They can email those to you.
if emailed, what prevents you from leaking it (along with other recent content of your email inbox) claiming somebody hacked your email ?
FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
21–30 of 129 posts
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#22The last discussion thread on this topic had more than a few people complaining that Isis (the given name of the developer in the article) is overreacting and paranoid, which is a saddening response to see. It exposes the privileges and unfortunate circumstances citizens find themselves in because these agencies refuse to prosecute their anti-terror investigations in well-thought out ways, instead pursuing facile leads without regard to the external effects they cause.
We've even seen evidence that these agencies deliberately manipulate otherwise innocent people into behavior that implicates them in their "terror suspect" criteria, so it's hard to believe that anyone in this situation could be somehow too cautious.
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#23It sounds like her concern is that they might show her a magic piece of paper which, once you've seen it, requires you to do certain things and prohibits you from ever talking about it to anyone.[1] Magic pieces of paper like that really shouldn't be a part of our legal system. [1] https://epic.org/privacy/nsl/
She does (still) have a canary: https://fyb.patternsinthevoid.net/canary.html
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#24It sounds like her concern is that they might show her a magic piece of paper which, once you've seen it, requires you to do certain things and prohibits you from ever talking about it to anyone.[1] Magic pieces of paper like that really shouldn't be a part of our legal system. [1] https://epic.org/privacy/nsl/
They can email those to you.
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#25Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#26The original story told about a couple of polite phonecalls where they have requested to talk with her. How does it get described as "harassment"? Of course, she also added a lot of paranoid speculation to her original blog post, but there's not a single confirmation of her fears so far, not even a hint.
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#27fuck bloody off.
- sincerely, me
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
They can email those to you.
I don't think sending an email would legally count as a served subpoena, at least not unless you somehow (at the very least, but I doubt that's sufficient) indicated that you're fine with that? I'm not familiar with how this is practiced in the U.S., but in many EU countries, "regular" email is essentially useless in a court of law, even more so for something like a subpoena which needs to be served in person.
Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#29Re: FBI Harassing Core Tor Developer, Demand Meeting, but Refusing to Explain Why
#30It sounds like her concern is that they might show her a magic piece of paper which, once you've seen it, requires you to do certain things and prohibits you from ever talking about it to anyone.[1] Magic pieces of paper like that really shouldn't be a part of our legal system. [1] https://epic.org/privacy/nsl/
They would just serve the paper using the usual techniques for delivering legal papers to persons possibly unwilling to receive them. These techniques usually avoid identifying yourself upfront. I believe they rather want information which they cannot legally force her to divulge (otherwise see above), so they're trying their luck at intimidation.