Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry for the confusion. In the reddit post there are a couple of Linux Instant Answers referenced. They each have an overview page with metadata: https://duck.co/ia/view/linux_cheat_sheet https://duck.co/ia/view/linux_error To actually see them in action, here are two example queries: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=linux%20cheat%20sheet&ia=cheatshee... https://duckduckgo.com/?q=linux%20enoent It would be great if Linux e…
No probs, your documentation (once I found it) is actually top notch. Take it from someone who had to setup the LibreOffice repo on my system, which is quite well documented, you guys actually have the best and clearest documentation I've seen! Contributing was a pleasure :-)
DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
21–27 of 27 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
#22My favourite bang is !g
Re: DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
#23My favourite bang is !g
Agreed - I've found that >75% of my DuckDuckGo searches are !bang searches either for Wikipedia or Google-owned sites. I don't actually end up using DuckDuckGo search results all that much.
Chrome supports using different search engines directly.
In my Chrome, searching youtube.com is just "youquery", the en.wikipedia.org is "enquery", Google Maps is "maps..." etc.
The nice thing is that it picks up various search engines automatically. Useful for work etc.
And if you want to use DuckDuckGo occasionally, it's just a "duck" away.
(And Google is my default search engine.)
Re: DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed - I've found that >75% of my DuckDuckGo searches are !bang searches either for Wikipedia or Google-owned sites. I don't actually end up using DuckDuckGo search results all that much.
Why use DuckDuckGo then and suffer an extra roundtrip? Chrome supports using different search engines directly. In my Chrome, searching youtube.com is just "you query ", the en.wikipedia.org is "en query ", Google Maps is "maps..." etc. The nice thing is that it picks up various search engines automatically. Useful for work etc. And if you want to use DuckDuckGo occasionally , it's just a "duck " away. (And Google is…
Re: DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why use DuckDuckGo then and suffer an extra roundtrip? Chrome supports using different search engines directly. In my Chrome, searching youtube.com is just "you query ", the en.wikipedia.org is "en query ", Google Maps is "maps..." etc. The nice thing is that it picks up various search engines automatically. Useful for work etc. And if you want to use DuckDuckGo occasionally , it's just a "duck " away. (And Google is…
I really dislike Google as a company and I like that DDG allegedly encrypts my searches and gets the data instead.
Also, doesn't !g just open a Google search with the specified query?
Re: DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really dislike Google as a company and I like that DDG allegedly encrypts my searches and gets the data instead.
I don't think any amount of "encryption" will allow DDG to make a query to Google without Google knowing the contents of the query. Also, doesn't !g just open a Google search with the specified query?
Re: DuckDuckGo Wants Answers to Linux Questions
#27Earlier quoted context omitted.
Agreed - I've found that >75% of my DuckDuckGo searches are !bang searches either for Wikipedia or Google-owned sites. I don't actually end up using DuckDuckGo search results all that much.
Why use DuckDuckGo then and suffer an extra roundtrip? Chrome supports using different search engines directly. In my Chrome, searching youtube.com is just "you query ", the en.wikipedia.org is "en query ", Google Maps is "maps..." etc. The nice thing is that it picks up various search engines automatically. Useful for work etc. And if you want to use DuckDuckGo occasionally , it's just a "duck " away. (And Google is…