Earlier quoted context omitted.
Don't be absurd. There are dozens of wheat pathogens alone (here's my favorite: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stem_rust ) and we as a civilization have been dealing with them for a long long time.
Indeed, read a infectious disease news collection source like http://promedmail.org/ long enough and you might be surprised we have anything to eat beyond Soylent Green. Everything you love to eat has a host of pathogens that want to eat it first.
Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
21–30 of 30 posts
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) for cattle is about 10, pig 3, sheep 5, and chicken 2. That means we could feed about 10 times more people per hectacre on grains than using that grain as feed for beef. Ruminants are important for nutrient cycling and other ecosystem services, but far from efficient as a food source for humans. They are best utilized on marginal land where agriculture isn't ideal. https://en.wikipedia.org…
Yeah, in the US at least, the normal pattern is to raise cows on pastures, sometimes out in the dry west fantastic acreage of it, 1,000 acre ranches can be considered tiny, 10s of thousands are not uncommon, and/or including grazing rights. Then they're sent to a feed lot for some period of time to fatten up. Ah, from the article you linked: " However, comparisons of FCR among different species may be of little signi…
"More than half the U.S. grain and nearly 40 percent of world grain is being fed to livestock rather than being consumed directly by humans"
http://news.cornell.edu/stories/1997/08/us-could-feed-800-mi...
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#23Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, in the US at least, the normal pattern is to raise cows on pastures, sometimes out in the dry west fantastic acreage of it, 1,000 acre ranches can be considered tiny, 10s of thousands are not uncommon, and/or including grazing rights. Then they're sent to a feed lot for some period of time to fatten up. Ah, from the article you linked: " However, comparisons of FCR among different species may be of little signi…
I agree with you that it's mostly feedlot grains that we could redirect to humans, and that feedlot grains is a surprising amount of what we produce in total. "More than half the U.S. grain and nearly 40 percent of world grain is being fed to livestock rather than being consumed directly by humans" http://news.cornell.edu/stories/1997/08/us-could-feed-800-mi...
The title of your link: "U.S. could feed 800 million people with grain that livestock eat, Cornell ecologist advises animal scientists"
What, and give them type 2 diabetes?!?!!
Seriously, a lot of the usual suspects should reconsider their animus towards animal husbandry in the light of the increasing evidence the move to a low fat, high carbohydrate diet caused and is causing untold morbidity and mortality.
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting premise. I wonder if civilization would collapse, or if we'd be able to adapt our agriculture to more legumes and other vegetables quickly enough to avoid mass starvation.
The US plants more soy than wheat already so the adapting part would probably go OK. The bigger question would be the math about calories (it probably works out, meat production consumes a lot of calories). I guess we could also plant lots of potatoes (which produce more calories/acre than soy).
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed, read a infectious disease news collection source like http://promedmail.org/ long enough and you might be surprised we have anything to eat beyond Soylent Green. Everything you love to eat has a host of pathogens that want to eat it first.
Try gardening/farming. Starting with eggs. Snakes, weasels, raccoons, even the hens want them. Hawks want my chicks, as do snakes, raccoons, weasels, foxes, bobcats, and coyotes. Weasels, coyotes, foxes want the pullets and adult hens. Its like anything I want to raise is a buffet for nature. On the other hand, I have an electric fence.
Both my parents grew up on farms, and we kept a big garden when I was growing up, so I know this very well, although reading the article that link collects for many months was serious sobering.
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US plants more soy than wheat already so the adapting part would probably go OK. The bigger question would be the math about calories (it probably works out, meat production consumes a lot of calories). I guess we could also plant lots of potatoes (which produce more calories/acre than soy).
Topsoil erosion would be a massive problem.
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#27LSD for the masses? :-)
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
The US plants more soy than wheat already so the adapting part would probably go OK. The bigger question would be the math about calories (it probably works out, meat production consumes a lot of calories). I guess we could also plant lots of potatoes (which produce more calories/acre than soy).
Topsoil erosion would be a massive problem.
Heck, many people nowadays aren't even aware that soil organisms can manufacture bio-available nutrients from local minerals and the air.[2] The dominant view of soil seems to be as an inert tank that needs to be "refilled" with imported fertility.
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Topsoil erosion would be a massive problem.
That's something you start worrying about after you make sure no one is likely to starve, it can most likely wait a couple of years.
Re: Devastating wheat fungus appears in Asia for first time
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's something you start worrying about after you make sure no one is likely to starve, it can most likely wait a couple of years.
Actually, it's something you worry about now if you don't want people to starve.
In that context, for a couple or so of years you don't worry about soil erosion, except to avoid a repeat of the Dust Bowl, you worry about people not starving. Before AKA "now", and after the emergency period, yes, you worry about it, as we do now.