Actually I would expect game-players and game-instructors to do better than the median profession under such a scenario, because playing games against other humans for entertainment & pure enjoyment of competition is a very human pursuit.
In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
21–30 of 114 posts
Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#22I mean, that's like asking whether marathon runners have a future now that we've got cars. Exercising one's brain/having pleasure through the game could be an end in itself, and is independent of how machines perform.
I like that analogy a lot! It's not like "playing Go really well" ever solved any real-world problem, it has always been a competition among humans. What should change, there?
Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#23Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#24Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#25From the article: "It is estimated that, of South Korea’s three hundred and twenty pros, only around fifty are able to earn a living on tournament winnings." This isn't going to result in massive unemployment. However, cheating with computer assistance is likely to become a problem, as it is in chess.[1] (The state of the art in computer chess is now roughly at "laptop with off the shelf program can curb-stomp human…
Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
I like that analogy a lot! It's not like "playing Go really well" ever solved any real-world problem, it has always been a competition among humans. What should change, there?
I feel like the author completely misunderstood why AlphaGo is exciting. It's about advancements in technology and soft AI, Go has almost nothing to do with it.
Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#27From the article: "It is estimated that, of South Korea’s three hundred and twenty pros, only around fifty are able to earn a living on tournament winnings." This isn't going to result in massive unemployment. However, cheating with computer assistance is likely to become a problem, as it is in chess.[1] (The state of the art in computer chess is now roughly at "laptop with off the shelf program can curb-stomp human…
What kind of configuration would you need to run the DeepMind setup? Looking at the wikipedia page if we assume the setup [1] there then it seems like at this time it would be out of the realm of feasibility at this time of setting up this software for cheating. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaGo#Hardware
Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#28Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#29From the article: "It is estimated that, of South Korea’s three hundred and twenty pros, only around fifty are able to earn a living on tournament winnings." This isn't going to result in massive unemployment. However, cheating with computer assistance is likely to become a problem, as it is in chess.[1] (The state of the art in computer chess is now roughly at "laptop with off the shelf program can curb-stomp human…
What kind of configuration would you need to run the DeepMind setup? Looking at the wikipedia page if we assume the setup [1] there then it seems like at this time it would be out of the realm of feasibility at this time of setting up this software for cheating. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AlphaGo#Hardware
[1] https://twitter.com/demishassabis/status/708489093676568576
Re: In the Age of Google DeepMind, Do the Young Go Prodigies of Asia Have a Future?
#30I gather this may be a Big Deal, but except insofar as it kills the sport by a thousand cuts, 'Young Go Prodigies' have nothing to worry about.