> As if both drives do exactly the same writes at the same time, chances are they will fail at the same time.
You mean due to exhausting their endurance? This is something you monitor, you should have plenty of time to replace the drives before it becomes a concern.
For other failures, how's it going to be any different from normal HD's? There's always the risk that having the same models/batches in the same conditions might lead to a cluster of failures, but RAID's still likely to save you from plenty of other failure modes.
For instance, the recent Google study[1] suggests that uncorrectable errors with SSDs are actually more common than HD's: "More than 20% of flash drives develop uncorrectable errors in a four year period... significantly higher rates .. than hard disk drives".
I've certainly seen enough IO errors from SSDs to know I want to defend against them. Not to mention the silent data corruption I've seen (and been protected from, yay ZFS).
1: http://0b4af6cdc2f0c5998459-c0245c5c937c5dedcca3f1764ecc9b2f...