Live data from Hacker News

Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

wired.com

21–30 of 162 posts

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#21
I would submit that posting this drivel on HK is unnecessary.

I'm all for real Bitcoin news, even about whats-his-face in Japan or interviews with old cypherpunks. Or new forks or new coins or ponzi schemes or silly lost hard drives even.

But this article is unfounded clickbait nonsense. Whomever the real SN is has done good security work on their identity and won't be found unless they want to.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#23

This feels like a really weird story, on one hand I've wanted to know the answer to this forever and on the other hand, this doesn't really seem to be a story at all:) So what does this mean for bitcoin, anything?

If this turns out to be true, it could mean a lot or nothing, depending on what Wright decides to do. The big questions would be, a) does he have the private keys to Satoshi's 1.1MM BTC stash or has he lost them and b) will he decide to be actively involved in Bitcoin development/governance.

The Bitcoin market has mostly been assuming that Satoshi's bitcoins are lost forever, and the price reflects that. If it turns out Wright can still sell those Bitcoins it would have a dramatic- but probably not cataclysmic- effect on the price.

The other question would be if he wanted to involve himself in Bitcoin development. If he really is Satoshi, his voice would carry a lot of weight on big, divisive issues like block size. For better or worse.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#25
post #11

They don't seem to have spotted that the second "perplexing" email is a word-for-word quote from Neuromancer. Which is particularly funny given that they managed to figure out the William Gibson reference. I had to explain to my wife why I was laughing so hard.

Which email are you referring to? None of the phrases in the second email (starting with "The nature of this moniker") appear in any of Gibson's Sprawl trilogy.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#26
post #12

gwern, should we really be doing this? Why not leave the guy alone? Obviously he does not want to be found out... let him have his peace!

I'm really not too sure why you're being downvoted. I think there are a number of people who agree that outing him isn't necessary or valuable. A man trying not to be in the public eye deserves as much.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#27
post #18

If Satoshi is Wright, and he really wanted to remain nameless, he almost certainly would not have shown up to the Bitcoin Investor’s Conference. Poor op-sec. That said, the issue with outing him is that he could hold more sway over the direction of BTC than if it were a truly decentralized currency. Not sure this if that's in the best interests of BTC.

Judging by the trainwreck that the debate over the change in block size ended up being, maybe Bitcoin could use a benevolent dictator.

It wasn't a trainwreck; it worked exactly as it should.

Bitcoin is not a system for those that favor changing the rules once the game is in play.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#28
post #11

They don't seem to have spotted that the second "perplexing" email is a word-for-word quote from Neuromancer. Which is particularly funny given that they managed to figure out the William Gibson reference. I had to explain to my wife why I was laughing so hard.

They probably just figured out the Tessier-Ashpool reference by Googling it, which would explain why they didn't recognize the passage from Neuromancer.

Re: Satoshi Nakamoto Is Probably This Unknown Australian Genius?

#30
post #26
post #12

gwern, should we really be doing this? Why not leave the guy alone? Obviously he does not want to be found out... let him have his peace!

I'm really not too sure why you're being downvoted. I think there are a number of people who agree that outing him isn't necessary or valuable. A man trying not to be in the public eye deserves as much.

It's actually really really unsafe for him. The moment people find out that he's a billionaire (Satoshi's BTC are worth a 9-digit figure), he might be a victim of an attack.
Post reply on HN