Live data from Hacker News

When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

washingtonpost.com

21–30 of 89 posts

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#21
post #9

Let's compromise. I promise to be totally clear, transparent, and straightforward in my ticket purchases as long as the airlines are totally clear, transparent, and straightforward in their ticket pricing. Any takers? ...No?

I will take it - the airline charges the maximum their datamining of your information tells them you are able to tolerate.

Which is basically how free market is supposed to work, right? ;).

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#22

Looking at the reactions of people to this topic, I come to believe there are two general approaches to life. Some people try to look at the whole game and want everyone to win, so they play by the rules. In terms of prisoner's dilemma, they choose to cooperate. Others notice that the market economy is designed around people being selfish, so they use it to justify defecting - minding only their own short-term intere…

Since when is trying to get the best deal immoral? Airlines try to get as much money as they can from their customers, and their customers are rightfully going to do the same to them.

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#24
post #14

When is it unethical for Facebook to pay less tax than the average working person? When is it unethical for BP to say they're sick of cleaning up their oil spills and they're going to stop doing it? When is it unethical for the bankers and mortgage lenders to do what they did in 2008? When companies interact with us, they appear to have no ethical obligations of any kind, so it's amusing to think we're somehow bound…

Because you're making a general point - since when one's unethical behaviour justifies you to retaliate in kind? Two wrongs doesn't make a right, etc.

Agreed, mostly. Consider though: the company cannot claim the playing field operates on ethics, when they don't play by those rules. Its reasonable then to claim "Caging a good price by lawyering the rules is fair play".

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#26

Looking at the reactions of people to this topic, I come to believe there are two general approaches to life. Some people try to look at the whole game and want everyone to win, so they play by the rules. In terms of prisoner's dilemma, they choose to cooperate. Others notice that the market economy is designed around people being selfish, so they use it to justify defecting - minding only their own short-term intere…

The issue I think most people have with a cooperative approach is that the airlines (indeed, any private businesses organization in a free market) aren't playing cooperatively. They are by definition playing selfishly, with behavior only moderated by applicable government regulations and desire not to anger their customers so much so as to prevent future business.

Ex those considerations, do you really think they would (or could, given the competitive state of air service) leave money with the consumer because it's "more fair"?

Monkey see, monkey do: $%^@ them.*

*For values of @#$^ that don't actually include breaking laws. E.g. obtaining illegal access to their system(s) and creating yourself a ticket.

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#27
Henry Flagler kept a quote in his office, "Do unto others as they would do unto you and do it first."

The airlines do everything legal to charge more and I do everything legal to pay less. The airline has an army of lawyers, lobbyists, and consultants and I have a VPN.

"Getting a good deal should comply with local laws and the travel company’s code of business conduct." Since when did an airline have the moral authority to declare a code of conduct for anyone but itself? Where did they find this lady?

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#28
post #20

Looking at the reactions of people to this topic, I come to believe there are two general approaches to life. Some people try to look at the whole game and want everyone to win, so they play by the rules. In terms of prisoner's dilemma, they choose to cooperate. Others notice that the market economy is designed around people being selfish, so they use it to justify defecting - minding only their own short-term intere…

I wouldn't segregate the general approaches to life in that sense. Providing different prices to different groups of people does not result in "everyone winning". It's a classical example of market segmentation, price based on the average ability to pay of someone who holds the currency. It entirely benefits the airliner, and their profits, to be able to do so. The "hidden city" tickets? A cheaper ticket to go from A…

I understand, and in general, I hate market segmentation. But I'm willing to excuse airlines for now, because... without it we wouldn't be flying.

You're right - the prices are not reflecting the costs. A typical traveler pays nowhere near the price they would if there was no segmentation. An average tourist ticket multiplied by number of passengers is barely enough to fuel a jet. And you have to pay the pilots, the airplane crew, the ground crew and still have enough to keep the lights on at the airport. Airlines are in a shitty position, and while probably some of it its their own fault, I'm not that sure if being hard on them is helping anyone.

Re: When is a ‘travel hack’ unethical?

#29

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will take it - the airline charges the maximum their datamining of your information tells them you are able to tolerate.

Which is basically how free market is supposed to work, right? ;).

Air travel is not a free market - the capital requirements are insane, the cost of fuel is often subsidized by the government (you cannot tax or excise it IIRC), you have a lot of regulations and so on ...
Post reply on HN