21–30 of 42 posts
This is super cool and fast, I'm impressed. Thought I would note, it looks like the catch rates of all the pokemon all incorrectly display 0%.
(Ironically, the actual demo site (pokedex.org) seems to be well behaved in comparison, using ~0% of my CPU, even though it's much more complex.)
More information about it here: http://www.pokemon.com/us/pokemon-video-games/pokemon-go/
Love the techstack for sure! Super sweet
For some reason this blog post is using 100% of my CPU while it's sitting idle in the background. Really odd for something that's just static text. Any idea what's going on here? (Ironically, the actual demo site (pokedex.org) seems to be well behaved in comparison, using ~0% of my CPU, even though it's much more complex.)
For some reason this blog post is using 100% of my CPU while it's sitting idle in the background. Really odd for something that's just static text. Any idea what's going on here? (Ironically, the actual demo site (pokedex.org) seems to be well behaved in comparison, using ~0% of my CPU, even though it's much more complex.)
Hm, that might be due to the autoloop s I have in there (which are great for illustrating the animations, but may be a bit indulgent). Which browser are you on?
And I think you're right. I just removed the loop attribute from all the tags, and CPU usage quickly dropped back down to normal.
As someone who doesn't spend much time on the front end of things, this post renewed my interest. Great explanation of tech used and why. Actually using it on my Nexus 5 was unlike any site I've used before.
It's nice, but you should have used Veekun's data: https://github.com/veekun/pokedex/wiki/Getting-Data