I really like the idea but it's completely off. What it should do is measure your reaction time: the time between the sign appearing on screen and the user pressing the mouse or tapping the screen. What it does is include frame rendering time. I apparently have the reaction speed of a 80-year-old at 22 (900ms), while I'm sure my reaction time on computers is around 225ms (measured on different occasions). Also, you c…
How old are you based on your reactions?
21–30 of 52 posts
Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#22Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#23I wonder if something which flatters the user is more likely to go viral? That it consistently underestimates my age by a couple of decades certainly makes me want to link to it and boast.
Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#24Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#25I may be off here but, I found that when I had the window fullscreen the graphics were rendering very slowly and my reaction times were very slow. I then made the window smaller and the graphics were much smoother time and my reaction times were much better.
Same here. I reduced my reaction time from 500ms to sub-300 after re-sizing the window down to about 400 by 400 px. If anything, their model suffers from omitted variable bias--the power of your computer!
Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#26Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#27Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#28It might be a good idea to standardise just on keyboard or mouse.
Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#29update: when you actually know what will happen it skews in other direction. I got 312 ms (20-year-old) after several tries.
Re: How old are you based on your reactions?
#30Interesting, I get a decade younger with each try... Doubt there is much behind the conversion between reaction time and age, but it's a nice setting to test your reaction time :-)
I was 57 the first time though.