Trademark stuff, ok, it makes sense they can't use their logos and such. But the whole quality control, food handling, meh. Soon as it's paid for and in the customer's hands, it's the customer's business what happens to it next, not In-N-Outs, it's not theirs anymore.
If you get a bad experience because DoorDash took too long or dropped the box and didn't tell you I suspect some/many/most? people might blame the restaurant, not DoorDash. So in that sense I can see why In-N-Out would care since from their POV DoorDash is appearing to represent them to customers.
In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
21–30 of 79 posts
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#22I don't know how DoorDash could make In-N-Out food worse. Seriously their food is not good. I see the trademark angle but the quality? Please they should start with making something worth while.
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#23Trademark stuff, ok, it makes sense they can't use their logos and such. But the whole quality control, food handling, meh. Soon as it's paid for and in the customer's hands, it's the customer's business what happens to it next, not In-N-Outs, it's not theirs anymore.
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#24Trademark stuff, ok, it makes sense they can't use their logos and such. But the whole quality control, food handling, meh. Soon as it's paid for and in the customer's hands, it's the customer's business what happens to it next, not In-N-Outs, it's not theirs anymore.
If you get a bad experience because DoorDash took too long or dropped the box and didn't tell you I suspect some/many/most? people might blame the restaurant, not DoorDash. So in that sense I can see why In-N-Out would care since from their POV DoorDash is appearing to represent them to customers.
Hence why they should not be allowed to use In-n-Out's logo or otherwise imply there's some sort of partnership.
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#25Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you get a bad experience because DoorDash took too long or dropped the box and didn't tell you I suspect some/many/most? people might blame the restaurant, not DoorDash. So in that sense I can see why In-N-Out would care since from their POV DoorDash is appearing to represent them to customers.
I understand why In-N-Out might be upset, but I don't understand how they could possibly have any legal standing.
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#27I completely understand. I used DoorDash exactly once to order from a local Chinese restaurant. The food was delivered by a dude who looked disinterested, and the containers were crushed and leaking lots of brown sauce into the plastic bag. It wasn't a great experience. Whose fault was it? I dunno. But I haven't ordered from DoorDash or that Chinese restaurant since.
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#28Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not necessarily.. if people start to get sick, who has the liability. Jack in the Box had bad food practices and it killed a bunch of people. Same idea here.
> if people start to get sick, who has the liability The sick people, clearly. Just like the dead people who went to Jack in the Box. Exactly what kind of restitution are you proposing here? A pimped out grave?
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#29Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not necessarily.. if people start to get sick, who has the liability. Jack in the Box had bad food practices and it killed a bunch of people. Same idea here.
> if people start to get sick, who has the liability The sick people, clearly. Just like the dead people who went to Jack in the Box. Exactly what kind of restitution are you proposing here? A pimped out grave?
Re: In-N-Out Files Lawsuit Against Food Delivery Startup DoorDash
#30I don't know how DoorDash could make In-N-Out food worse. Seriously their food is not good. I see the trademark angle but the quality? Please they should start with making something worth while.
I'm going to go down the off-topic path with you as I would agree with you. On my last trip out to SF I tried them and I was really underwhelmed. As far as fast food burgers and fries went I enjoyed Carl's Jr. far more. The fries at In-N-Out is an interesting paradox. Without sauce they taste almost like nothing; the blandest fast food fries I've ever eaten. With sauce? It's okay. A bit too soggy for my liking but ok…
Their fries are made fresh on site, but they do tend to need salt.