I wrote a supplementary blog post to Brad's ( http://pindancing.blogspot.com/2010/01/learning-about-machin... ) with the list of books I found useful (no amazon referral links if anyone is worried) with brief descriptions of each. I work in somewhat different domains and so have a different list of books. I hope someone finds this useful. For those who want a summary, Proof Technique (a)Velleman's "How to Prove It" (…
Learning About Statistical Learning
21–30 of 44 posts
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#22I personally think that everyone in machine learning should be (completely) familiar with essentially all of the material in the following intermediate-level statistics book:
1.) Casella, G. and Berger, R.L. (2001). "Statistical Inference" Duxbury Press.
For a slightly more advanced book that's quite clear on mathematical techniques, the following book is quite good:
2.) Ferguson, T. (1996). "A Course in Large Sample Theory" Chapman & Hall/CRC.
You'll need to learn something about asymptotics at some point, and a good starting place is:
3.) Lehmann, E. (2004). "Elements of Large-Sample Theory" Springer.
Those are all frequentist books. You should also read something Bayesian:
4.) Gelman, A. et al. (2003). "Bayesian Data Analysis" Chapman & Hall/CRC.
and you should start to read about Bayesian computation:
5.) Robert, C. and Casella, G. (2005). "Monte Carlo Statistical Methods" Springer.
On the probability front, a good intermediate text is:
6.) Grimmett, G. and Stirzaker, D. (2001). "Probability and Random Processes" Oxford.
At a more advanced level, a very good text is the following:
7.) Pollard, D. (2001). "A User's Guide to Measure Theoretic Probability" Cambridge.
The standard advanced textbook is Durrett, R. (2005). "Probability: Theory and Examples" Duxbury.
Machine learning research also reposes on optimization theory. A good starting book on linear optimization that will prepare you for convex optimization:
8.) Bertsimas, D. and Tsitsiklis, J. (1997). "Introduction to Linear Optimization" Athena.
And then you can graduate to:
9.) Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. (2004). "Convex Optimization" Cambridge.
Getting a full understanding of algorithmic linear algebra is also important. At some point you should feel familiar with most of the material in
10.) Golub, G., and Van Loan, C. (1996). "Matrix Computations" Johns Hopkins.
It's good to know some information theory. The classic is:
11.) Cover, T. and Thomas, J. "Elements of Information Theory" Wiley.
Finally, if you want to start to learn some more abstract math, you might want to start to learn some functional analysis (if you haven't already). Functional analysis is essentially linear algebra in infinite dimensions, and it's necessary for kernel methods, for nonparametric Bayesian methods, and for various other topics. Here's a book that I find very readable:
12.) Kreyszig, E. (1989). "Introductory Functional Analysis with Applications" Wiley.
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#23Mike Jordan at Berkeley sent me his list on what people should learn for ML. The list is definitely on the more rigorous side (ie aimed at more researchers than practitioners), but going through these books (along with the requisite programming experience) is a useful, if not painful, exercise. I personally think that everyone in machine learning should be (completely) familiar with essentially all of the material in…
My go-to book for Machine Learning is Christopher Bishops Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. I've read that book cover-to-cover and its got an excellent foundation and covers all those other books in some capacity.
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#24Mike Jordan at Berkeley sent me his list on what people should learn for ML. The list is definitely on the more rigorous side (ie aimed at more researchers than practitioners), but going through these books (along with the requisite programming experience) is a useful, if not painful, exercise. I personally think that everyone in machine learning should be (completely) familiar with essentially all of the material in…
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#25Definitely a very good list. But also an expensive list! HNers: any suggestions on where to find these books for cheap. (outside university libraries)
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#26Thanks to liebke for posting this, and Bradford for writing it. I have two points. First, your point about programming is incredibly important. I've worked with people who had amazing insights about statistical problems, but went cross-eyed upon being asked about SVN and Git. This makes a CS homework assignment unpleasant, and a real world research project impossible. Second, this really begs another post. It should…
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#27Thanks to liebke for posting this, and Bradford for writing it. I have two points. First, your point about programming is incredibly important. I've worked with people who had amazing insights about statistical problems, but went cross-eyed upon being asked about SVN and Git. This makes a CS homework assignment unpleasant, and a real world research project impossible. Second, this really begs another post. It should…
+n.
I wasted 3 years trying to avoid this bit. On the positive side, once you learn to do this you will never be afraid of any book or paper again.
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#28This is a good list. That said, Why second edition intro to algs? Why not third? also, considering that intro to algs is one of the "Books Programmers Claim to Have Read" http://www.billthelizard.com/2008/12/books-programmers-dont-... , so those planning to read it, note that it is best learned in a classroom setting where you are forced to work through the problems. Finally, interesting that he does amazon reference…
Someone pointed out the 3rd ed was out in the blog comments. I hadn't noticed, so thanks. I agree that the CLR book is best learned by working through problems. For those that may not have retainend as much as they would have liked from classroom work, I think needing to use algorithms and programming them yourself also works very well. In that vein, CLR is also a great reference text. I don't make any money from Ama…
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#29Interesting on the one hand, but is anybody seriously going to go through those books one by one now? Personally I have troubles going through just one book (Pattern Recognition by Bishop atm), and even that might be useless without practical application. I managed to eventually read through MacKay (enjoyable book and available as a free PDF, too) and feel I have already forgotten most of it again :-( Another way mig…
1. Learn basic terminology (basically, skim the chapters and understand roughly what the topics are)
2. Work on a problem in depth. You are probably interested in a certain area or type of problem.
a. Read the relevant chapters in detail.
b. Pick up the necessary math along the way using additional references. This way you are motivated to learn it (whether it be calculus, probability, or linear algebra). E.g., it would be hard to approach McDiarmid's Inequality and be able to imagine its use. However, if you run across it in a book/paper you'll understand the context.
c. Lastly, checkout recent NIPS, ICML, and JMLR papers on the topic (nips.cc, jmlr.org, and icml isn't centralized, but each conference can probably be found online).
* - I am a graduate student and have been studying statistical machine learning for the last 3 years.
Re: Learning About Statistical Learning
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
"but is anybody seriously going to go through those books one by one now? Personally I have troubles going through just one book (Pattern Recognition by Bishop atm), and even that might be useless without practical application" Working through CLRS completely is a very time consuming task I think Bradford intended that book as a reference, but yes, you need to work through some of the stuff in order. For example, you…
I wish there was a more hands on introduction, somehow. Having read through MacKay, I didn't feel as if I could just approach a company and suggest to do data analysis for them. I suppose I should come up with my own projects, and I have some ideas, but they always have a huge question mark at the beginning.
http://www.amazon.com/Machine-Learning-Algorithmic-Perspecti...
Code here: http://www-ist.massey.ac.nz/smarsland/MLbook.html