Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

nytimes.com

21–30 of 211 posts

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#21
post #13

Twitter does not need to gain new users - it needs to reactivate old users. The statistic I cannot get past is that they have lost one billion users. That is a much different problem than most companies are dealing with.

I honestly wonder how many of twitter's accounts are fake accounts, it seems that spam is a huge problem there.

Probably quite a few, but no matter what an inactive account is -- spam, a novelty account, or an actual inactive person -- if you have 3 times as many inactive accounts as active accounts, there is something awry.

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#22
post #12

I still think it's impossible to run two companies that both require so much attention, given their stage. Yes Jobs had Apple and Pixar, and Musk has Tesla and SpaceX. But both Pixar and SpaceX don't really require day-to-day CEO attention, they follow long term plans (movies, rockets). That's really different from Square and Twitter, which are both, in their own ways, in a kind of trouble. I'd love to be proven wron…

again with this? jobs was never ceo of pixar...

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#24
post #5

People are worried that Jack will be too busy between Twitter and Square, but what they don't know is that the dude's been completely spaced out for the last 4 years, making the same motivational presentation about his Dad's pizza shop to anyone that will listen. Nobody at Twitter talks to Jack anymore, even the most Senior people.

Am I missing a joke here? (honest question)

He seems to be there mostly for PR and customer relations.

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#25
post #2

Here's his announcement on Twitter, among other details: https://twitter.com/jack/status/651003190628872192

Totally unreadable. This sums up a lot of what's wrong with Twitter. If even the CEO struggles to communicate effectively using the platform then...

Dave Winer mocked up how a fat tweet could look and I think he has it right:

http://scripting.com/2015/10/02/whatWouldAFatTweetLookLike.h...

Obviously, they've thought of this internally too. I wonder what the point of the 140 character limit is today (I think it made sense originally).

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#26
post #5

People are worried that Jack will be too busy between Twitter and Square, but what they don't know is that the dude's been completely spaced out for the last 4 years, making the same motivational presentation about his Dad's pizza shop to anyone that will listen. Nobody at Twitter talks to Jack anymore, even the most Senior people.

[deleted]

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#27
post #5

People are worried that Jack will be too busy between Twitter and Square, but what they don't know is that the dude's been completely spaced out for the last 4 years, making the same motivational presentation about his Dad's pizza shop to anyone that will listen. Nobody at Twitter talks to Jack anymore, even the most Senior people.

There was a great article a while back [on founding and rise of Twitter and Dorsey's bio] that did not paint him in a good light: "All is fair in love and Twitter" [0]

As one former Twitter employee has said, “The greatest product Jack Dorsey ever made was Jack Dorsey.”

[0] http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/13/magazine/all-is-fair-in-lo...

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#29
post #5

People are worried that Jack will be too busy between Twitter and Square, but what they don't know is that the dude's been completely spaced out for the last 4 years, making the same motivational presentation about his Dad's pizza shop to anyone that will listen. Nobody at Twitter talks to Jack anymore, even the most Senior people.

https://www.google.ru/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&es...

He really does like that story.

Re: Twitter Names Jack Dorsey Chief Executive

#30
I can't see this working out. Dorsey probably is the best candidate for CEO of Twitter, and I think there are some very low-hanging fruit to pick when it comes to solving Twitter's product issues (I disagree with Startup L Jackson - Twitter's product is not fucking fine). The market reaction has been positive - TWTR opened up 3.15% just now.

However, Square is a different story altogether. Square Wallet was a damp squib, and Square's facing competition both from established players like Intuit and more recent entrants to the market, like iZettle. Leading Square and bringing it to market seems like a full-time job to me, and I wouldn't be surprised if it's IPO valuation takes a hit because it lacks a full-time CEO.

Post reply on HN