Live data from Hacker News

Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

support.mozilla.org

191–200 of 290 posts

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#191
post #190
post #124

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But there’s not and the end result is the same.

Youtube paid works. People pay, get no ads. Kagi so far seems to be doing well for search too. One model may not work for all content types but to say that there is no alternative is straight up not true.

I'm not sure Youtube doing fine while local news sources go under and such a is a positive.

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#192
post #188
post #54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

FYI uBlock Origin Lite on iOS is inferior to AdGuard and (I think) Wipr as it's just a WebExtension, so it'll only block ads within Safari itself. AdGuard and Wipr use both the Web Extension and Content Blocker APIs, so they'll block ads in all web views system wide on top of within Safari itself. However as far as trustworthiness goes, uBlock is (imo) #1.

FWIW AdGuard dev team is in Russia. Letting them proxy all your traffic is probably not the wisest move.

If you use the Safari adblocker, it will use rule lists, not proxy all traffic.

That said, IMO on Safari Wipr all the way (though I use Brave Origin with its built-in blocker now, which is stellar).

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#193
post #191
post #190

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Youtube paid works. People pay, get no ads. Kagi so far seems to be doing well for search too. One model may not work for all content types but to say that there is no alternative is straight up not true.

I'm not sure Youtube doing fine while local news sources go under and such a is a positive.

What local news sources are going under? As far as I've seen not many actually are. I'm paying my local newspaper, it seems to be doing just fine.

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#194
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No offense to the author, but I don't trust a college kid the same way I trust the team behind uBlock. The latter have a well-established track record with substantial external eyes (including Firefox directly.)

Age of author shouldn’t be of relevance. Experience and/or team size should. A kid reading up on security from age 6 through college could have a decade of experience, for example.

[deleted]

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#195
post #40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've been using it for 20 years and switched 4 yearso ago to something else. My life is fine, thanks. EDIT: so, the downvotes are because what, exactly?

I didn't downvote you, but your post has no useful information and looks like pure Firefox bashing for no reason. You don't tell why you switched, to what, what you gained. Not even mentioning that wherever you switched, your protection against ads and tracking must have become worse, as only Firefox supports Ublock Origin.

The comment they replied to is just as useless though.

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#196
post #134

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No offense to the author, but I don't trust a college kid the same way I trust the team behind uBlock. The latter have a well-established track record with substantial external eyes (including Firefox directly.)

Age of author shouldn’t be of relevance. Experience and/or team size should. A kid reading up on security from age 6 through college could have a decade of experience, for example.

I'm not sure whether this comment is serious or not. Poe's law strikes again.

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#197
post #130
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just a comment on the narrative: > wBlock by an MIT student is open source It's funny to me that some find that narrative appealing. Here's another narrative: Many of those MIT students go on to be SV founders and employees who build, operate, and make millions or billions from the mass surveillance and ad industry. And I'm sure some participated in FOSS in college - what better way to build your resume for the surve…

The "narrative" above is that they're both made by seemingly well-intentioned solo developers, that's it. Use your own judgement for something that wants to inject JS into every website you visit.

> The "narrative" above is that they're both made by seemingly well-intentioned solo developers

Our comments don't disagree (though I was only responding to the comment parent to mine). My point is to question how 'MIT student' is a signal for 'well-intentioned'.

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#199

But advertising is the source of funding that many content creators rely on to make a living... Of course I don’t want Meta and Google profiting from mind-manipulating ads, but where is better business model? Crypto micropayments?

The way I see it, advertisers have violated any implicit bargain by adding the spying and surveillance aspect.

The traditional billboard or TV-ad is not part of a global system that creates a personal dossier of everything you view, how long you view it, and everyone who might be friends you viewed or shared it with you, and what groups that forms, etc.

Basically no consumer anywhere is going into it with informed consent--and they've planned it that way.

Re: Firefox for iOS now has a native adblocker

#200

In case anyone here missed it, there's a native Ublock Origin for Safari. It works great → https://apps.apple.com/us/app/ublock-origin-lite/id674534269...

Mostly so, it's got all the limitations of Manifest V3 which prevents it from doing a good bit of blocking, https://ublockorigin.com/#manifest-v3-section In particular: * Cannot use all filter lists simultaneously (rule limits apply) * No cosmetic filtering in the default mode * No scriptlet injection by default * Limited dynamic filtering capabilities * Requires broader host permissions upfront But it's definitely s…

You can have virtually unlimited amount of rules, its just a limit per list, the number of lists aint really limited.
Post reply on HN