Live data from Hacker News

The US tried to stop cartel money-laundering; devastated mom-and-pop businesses

theguardian.com

191–193 of 193 posts

Re: The US tried to stop cartel money-laundering; devastated mom-and-pop businesses

#191
post #45

My question is , why don't these people have bank accounts?

Depends. Why can't banks offer more debit cards to more people and, I don't know, stop honoring overdrafts? Transactions should decline, not overdraft, even with overdraft off . We've built lots of traps for people that have balances near-zero that keep them near zero, and one little mistake snowballs into blacklists from Telecheck, ChexSystems, and other fun companies. Meanwhile once you can keep your balance with a…

Yes. It's a little sad to see other comments assume that people have something to hide for doing something as basic as wanting to send money back to family.

Banking services with hidden fees can be inherently less predictable than working with cash and fee-based financial services for folks who have low income or irregular pay.

Re: The US tried to stop cartel money-laundering; devastated mom-and-pop businesses

#192
post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Money laundering is about hiding illegal actions by faking the source of the money. Generally speaking, it makes sense to me that a society wants to make that difficult.

If the underlying action is illegal, then go after the underlying action, LOL. How many millions of innocents have to suffer for one crook to be caught? To use your own words back at you, generally speaking, it makes sense that a society wants to make the lives of its citizens easier, not more convoluted. The truth about money laundering is a label used by the government to repress innocent individuals by burdening t…

> If the underlying action is illegal, then go after the underlying action,

Sure, but the best way to know there is illegal action is to flag money that comes out of nowhere.

> How many millions of innocents have to suffer for one crook to be caught?

You seem to be under the wrong expression that the article is about money laundering, but it is not, that's just the legal framework used to achieve the goal. If it weren't for money laundering, they works have chosen something else to achieve their goals.

Post reply on HN