Earlier quoted context omitted.
Because people don't want random water marks being applied to their artwork. We've been using AI edited image and video using "filters" for years and the world hasn't ended. Time and time again these AI labs will fear monger how bad and dangerous these AI models are when in reality it is not the case and is just an excuse for them to exert power over others using their lead.
If you can’t see the watermark (you called it “invisible”) then what’s the issue?
Nano Banana 2 Lite
191–200 of 214 posts
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#192It's really fast. But fast in a way that reminds me this joke: > Does this pill make me smater? > No, but it can make you dumb faster!
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#193Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#194Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
prime example of why there can't be discourse happening right here ^
Ah, the irony.
nothing about policy or any specific thing you could have a civil conversation about.
they didn't even say what perceived racist, corrupt, etc. delusional take they're talking about.
unless I'm on a liberal newsletter how would I know the conspiracies they're talking about?
to answer in one word GP's main question "Which part attracts you the most?"
Sanity.
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
prime example of why there can't be discourse happening right here ^
If you're willing to overlook the corruption, the self dealing, the disrespect for the Constitution and rule of law, and the racism, then I agree. There is no useful discourse to be had with you.
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#197Earlier quoted context omitted.
If you're willing to overlook the corruption, the self dealing, the disrespect for the Constitution and rule of law, and the racism, then I agree. There is no useful discourse to be had with you.
[flagged]
You must be incensed over Jared Kushner's diplomatic roles and $2B investments from the Saudis, then?
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
You basically cannot enforce any laws on corporations when Republicans are in control. ~50% of voters decided that they should be able to do literally anything they want and Buyer Beware is a good way to structure society and commerce.
Do you really think 50% of voters thought this was what they were getting? I think most of them thought “dunno what is going on, but this guy seems confident and says it’ll be good if we vote for him”.
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
> I'd rather someone be rich before office not have their son work on a Ukrainian oil company while their father is VP that handles relations with said country. You must be incensed over Jared Kushner's diplomatic roles and $2B investments from the Saudis, then?
Meanwhile Jared got the Abraham Accords and is working on other peace deals.
Hunter was a crackhead being paid in diamonds by a corrupt oil company. Not the same is it?
Re: Nano Banana 2 Lite
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
> I'd rather someone be rich before office not have their son work on a Ukrainian oil company while their father is VP that handles relations with said country. You must be incensed over Jared Kushner's diplomatic roles and $2B investments from the Saudis, then?
He formed an investment group after leaving government. Hunter worked for an oil company (no experience) WHILE his father was overseeing the country relations. And the company he worked for was under investigation for corruption. Joe bragged about getting that prosecutor fired. Meanwhile Jared got the Abraham Accords and is working on other peace deals. Hunter was a crackhead being paid in diamonds by a corrupt oil c…
> Hunter was a crackhead being paid in diamonds by a corrupt oil company. Not the same is it?
For sure. Kushner/Trump's corruption is far more lucrative.