Can anyone else not stand quanta magazine? Everything posted here from there is the most woo-based, mis-represented, science mumbo jumbo. I didnt read the article cause this seems like a prime example of that so someone can correct me if I’m wrong
> I didnt read the article cause this seems like a prime example of that so someone can correct me if I’m wrong if only there were some kind of magical universal summarizer you could use..
Why would i summarize an article i don't want to read to produce llm output that i don't want to read