Live data from Hacker News

The real cost of owning a home

ericturner.dev

191–200 of 901 posts

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#191
There are lots of often overlooked costs to own a home. I have been 15 years in my place, and now I get some advantages e.g. my loan is fixed so the monthly cost is roughly the same as 15 years ago... in a place like San Francisco, it is nice.

The property tax goes up slightly every year, but not faster than inflation.

There are recurring things to maintain (repaint every ~10 years), the roof has been patched about 10 years ago, might need a new coat eventually.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#192
post #139
post #6

Beyond the financials, the psychological impact of both being able to make greater-than-superficial changes, and having extremely predictable payments for years without worrying about substantial rent increases, is substantial. I redid/improved the bathroom to exactly what I wanted. I renovated the kitchen. I added paneling to the walls. I added a few outlets to rooms that needed more. I wouldn't do these things in a…

“Extremely predictable payments” - I don’t own a home, so I don’t know about this - I have heard mostly horror stories about HOA. Can they hike maintenance fees arbitrarily? Also, what about insurance? Last I read, at least in FL, insurance cost is out of control, is that still true?

Don’t buy a home in an HOA and avoid living in a place with extreme high risk of property destruction. Neither are requirements of owning a home.

HOA complaints typically are about control not really cost, and the terms are disclosed before purchase so not unpredictable at all, you are allowed to see the full financials and can see the financial health of the organization before committing. Insurance costs are directly correlated to risk, the costs are only as out of control as the risks (which are well known in Florida). E.g. if insurance expects to have to replace a roof every 5 years on average, and to replace a house every 30 years, expect to pay for 1/5th of a roof and 1/30th of a house in your insurance bill, on top of all the other risks.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#193
post #39

“Smart” people always tell us to rent. But ask any regular person if they’d rather own a home or rent and they will say own. Who cares about xyz costs or a lower investment return. The entire point is to have a stable base from which you and your family can thrive.

Smart people always tell us to buy a cheap used Honda. But ask any regular person and they will say they’d rather have a new Porsche.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#194
post #153

A lot of discussion of the cons without discussion of the pros. For example: 1) your home is a hedge against inflation, your $2000 to interest sounds terrible when rent is $2500, but doesn't sound so bad if rent rises to $3500. If you live in your home for long enough, this is all but guaranteed. 2) your home is a leveraged investment. You may only be getting 4% per year in appreciation, but that's 4% gains on the to…

> Interest rates sure have made it less of a good deal than it was ~5-10 years ago, but it's usually still worth it in the long run.

Not only that, but when interest rates come down it's usually pretty easy to refinance

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#195
post #11

This is nonsense. The person counts the 12 month escrow prepayment during closing as "cost to get a loan" It's not. It's the cost of 12 months of taxes and insurance on your property. Also notable is the "1 year insurance premium" either they're double counting the escrow, or this 1 year insurance premium is mortgage insurance where the bank makes you take out insurance to protect them. This can be prepaid, split pai…

They also neglect the Mortage Interest Tax Deduction and State and Local Tax Deductions, whcih reduce the cost of both by your marginal tax rate, and is a big benefit towards owning. More importantly, this neglects that buying a home is locking in the price for the long term for the majority of your housing cost. Buying usually is similar all in the first year, but after 5 years your mortage payment is the same while…

Not everyone benefits since many people take the standard deduction.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#196
post #153

A lot of discussion of the cons without discussion of the pros. For example: 1) your home is a hedge against inflation, your $2000 to interest sounds terrible when rent is $2500, but doesn't sound so bad if rent rises to $3500. If you live in your home for long enough, this is all but guaranteed. 2) your home is a leveraged investment. You may only be getting 4% per year in appreciation, but that's 4% gains on the to…

> your home is a leveraged investment Which means the potential losses are leveraged too. Plenty of people have ended up in that position. It isn't all upside.

All investments inherently have risk. Looking at historical data the average return is 4% per year on houses in the US. This average includes the '08 housing market crash. If you hold for long enough, your risk is drastically mitigated. Whereas with rent you're basically guaranteed for prices to go up year over year, unless we are in a deflationary market which is quite rare.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#197

The benefit of owning a home is almost always psychological, not financial. If you take the money you'd use for a down payment and mortgage and invest it instead (after paying rent) you end up in about the same place. But the psychological benefits can be huge. You have much greater control over the place you spend most of your time. You can change it to your liking. You don't have to worry about rent increases or ow…

Yes, this is broadly correct. The free market will (roughly) arbitrage out any differences between owning and renting. The hidden factor is that whatever money you have in house equity represents opportunity cost that it isn't in investments. If you have 400k in a house and the stock market returns 6% over inflation, then the opportunity cost is 2k per month in interest, which is comparable to what you'd pay in rent.

There are tax advantages that favor owning (in the US), for a primary resident and not an arbitrageur - mortgage interest and capital gains when you sell are not taxed, while capital gains in a non-retirement account are.

You can gain by appreciation and leverage, of course - but you can just as easily not, you don't know if your city is going to be the next high-flying Austin or Boulder, or run-down Detroit. My own house has been flat in estimated value for four years in an area that I thought would continue to rise.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#198

If you're in SF and weighing this decision, it's easy to get tilted in the buy direction because the rental stock is so horrific. Landlords have very little incentive to update properties or provide basic amenities that people take for granted in other major cities (good luck getting a washer/dryer).

I wonder if there’s any reason SF has that problem yet almost no other cities do.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#199

The benefit of owning a home is almost always psychological, not financial. If you take the money you'd use for a down payment and mortgage and invest it instead (after paying rent) you end up in about the same place. But the psychological benefits can be huge. You have much greater control over the place you spend most of your time. You can change it to your liking. You don't have to worry about rent increases or ow…

> If you take the money you'd use for a down payment and mortgage and invest it instead (after paying rent) you end up in about the same place.

You'd actually end up in a much better place historically, homes were never a particularly good investment in the US, but there are very few people who can pull it off and actually invest the difference and not just spend it.

Re: The real cost of owning a home

#200

Ben Felix, a Canadian portfolio manager that does personal finance videos and podcast, has been arguing for years that rent versus buy is often a wash financially, and that you should make the decision for non-financial resasons. * recent 2026 video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aU7v87EhDBI * 2025a: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4H9LL7A-nQ * 2025b: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBG-g1CKfgs * 2021: https://www…

If you can buy low and sell high it’s worth it. Especially if you’re positioned to buy when you can lock in low mortgage rates. Above 6% you might be better off putting your down payment into the stock market and renting. It’s also more likely that you’ll feel good about spending money to improve the home if you think you can get the money back when you sell. (And then you get to live in a more pleasant place for yea…

It's okay to do things that don't maximize your return.

Everybody is so obsessed with squeezing out the maximum amount of money from everything, it's exhausting.

Post reply on HN