Live data from Hacker News

Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

github.com

191–200 of 284 posts

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#191
post #115

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This kind of services that requires the user to share a seed/code to the recipient always seems kinda awkward to me. The code is not simple/short enough to be verbally communicated; If I can send the code, I usually can just send the file.

Not necessarily. For example I might have a few gigs of photos to send someone, and I want to send them uncompressed. I could text someone the seed or QR code for them to download the photos, but I can't send those photos (especially uncompressed, even if over RCS or WhatsApp) over text.

Wouldn’t this use your internet data, though? Isn’t the point of these tools to send locally without being limited by internet speeds and without having to use your mobile data?

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#193
post #76

Just use the existing magic wormhole protocol. It works and has been deployed for a long time.

No. It is using a central “well known server” and requires internet. Test: * Does it work in an airplane? * Does it work in a submarine? * Does it work in the mountains, when a thunderstorm is approach and you need to share the GPX? Basically my Garmin Edge and iPhone can do this. Magic-Wormhole fails in all test cases. Implementation shall be able to negoiate a connection locally (e.g. Bluetooth) and upgrade to peer…

Modifications can be made to do that minimal peer exchange over BT. They may already exist, but I haven't used that part yet.

It seems like a lot of extra work to reinvent the wheel and get the security wrong instead of extending a well established protocol with many other tools built on top of it.

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#194
post #32
post #8

Recently started using it, it works really well and it's much more reliable than AirDrop. But the UX could be improved. But I just wish Apple fixed AirDrop, every time I go to use I have so little confidence in it, it often doesn't see devices or if you have multiple Mac users it will confuse them, showing you the same Mac device twice without telling you which user it is

I'm curious, what do you people use this for? What are all these (presumably large) files that you guys are generating and transferring, that requires the use of apps like these? Like in my case, the only files I generate on my phone are photos and videos, and these get backed up by Immich, which I can then share with someone by sending them a link to the files/album in question. I imagine normal folks would use iClo…

Sending someone a link to a photo is a much worse experience than sending them the actual photo directly to their phone.

Sending a photo over text message often compresses it, which isn't always desirable. (Not actually sure if it gets compressed when sent of iMessage)

I've also used it to send people photos when we were in places without cell service like on hiking and camping trips.

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#195
post #32
post #8

Recently started using it, it works really well and it's much more reliable than AirDrop. But the UX could be improved. But I just wish Apple fixed AirDrop, every time I go to use I have so little confidence in it, it often doesn't see devices or if you have multiple Mac users it will confuse them, showing you the same Mac device twice without telling you which user it is

I'm curious, what do you people use this for? What are all these (presumably large) files that you guys are generating and transferring, that requires the use of apps like these? Like in my case, the only files I generate on my phone are photos and videos, and these get backed up by Immich, which I can then share with someone by sending them a link to the files/album in question. I imagine normal folks would use iClo…

I only use it for sending a bunch of photos that wouldn't go so well over iMessage, usually on vacation. And sometimes that vacation involves not having cell service. Otherwise I'll usually message a single photo to someone because AirDrop is finicky.

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#197

My problem is that all these alternatives require the devices to be on the same local network. One beauty of Airdrop is that it creates and handles that local network automatically under the hood (as far as I understand). So you could be out on a hike with friends and Airdrop something. The workaround I've found after switching to an Android device has been to teather my connection to my friend's device, which ends u…

I just use blip to send files to anyone on any device

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#198

My problem is that all these alternatives require the devices to be on the same local network. One beauty of Airdrop is that it creates and handles that local network automatically under the hood (as far as I understand). So you could be out on a hike with friends and Airdrop something. The workaround I've found after switching to an Android device has been to teather my connection to my friend's device, which ends u…

I just use blip to send files to anyone on any device but it requires an account

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it isn't? The main feature is sending things peer to peer.

That's not a feature that's a purpose.

So what? Anyway the more important difference is it requires both computers to be on the same LAN. The main point of AirDrop is you can share between two devices with or without LAN, with or without internet.

Re: Localsend: An open-source cross-platform alternative to AirDrop

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quickshare does

Never worked for me, not even once. I tried on three phones, two of which are using the same account, I'm reasonably confident I am technically competent to not make silly mistakes, though the best I've achieved was endless wait. I had better success with IR and BT file transfers. Hell, even spinning a local http server (with python -m http.server) works better than quick share.

Idk what Quickshare is, but AirDrop has only worked like 25% of the time for me
Post reply on HN