Live data from Hacker News

Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

itsfoss.com

191–200 of 276 posts

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#191
post #9

I migrated from Firefox to Brave years ago, and it's been incredible. It's easy to turn off the crypto stuff and turn on more advanced privacy protection. Then it's just a fast browser with awesome adblocking. My favorite recent feature has been Brave Scriptlets, which are just little javascript functions you can run on specific sites. I've replaced most of the add ons I used with small scripts. Pretty nice. I would…

[dead]

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#192
post #134

I stopped paying attention when the major browsers started to act somewhat against the interests of ad-blocking add-ons, some years ago. Would anyone who has kept up let me know what would be the 2026 "industry standard" in terms of an ad-blocking and privacy stack? I primarily use Chrome on Mac and Safari on iPhone but I'm willing to change browsers for better ad-blocking and privacy. I would also be interested in s…

Firefox with uBlock Origin. Nothing else comes close.

[dead]

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#193
post #171

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Doesn't iOS restrict all browsers to using WebKit?

Yep, but your typical Apple user is happy to blame everybody but themselves and Apple.

Only because your typical non-Apple user is almost always the one trying to enforce non-Apple standards onto Apple hardware and software.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#194
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the use case for keyboard shortcuts on handheld devices? On desktops/laptops, keyboard shortcuts save reaching for a mouse, aiming (on the relativley large screen), and clicking. On handhelds, I don't think it's faster to use a shortcut than to simply tap something an inch away. Also, on handhelds, the keyboard blocks a significant part of the screen. And keyboard shortcuts typically use accelerator keys, whi…

>What is the use case for keyboard shortcuts on handheld devices? As someone who bought an HTC Dream / Android G1 when it was new, and wishes more handhelds had a similar form factor, this comment depresses me. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTC_Dream

Back when Android had an actually pretty and unique UI. Good times.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But MV3 supports uBlock Origin Lite. Which, in my experience, blocks ads just as well, but also lets pages load significantly faster. MV3 supports uBlock.

Just as one example: Chrome + uBOL on Reddit will show you plenty of "Sponsored" stuff. You can use Inspector to find the offending CSS classes and then use `display: none` on them with something like Stylus[0], but not everybody wants to play that whack-a-mole game on the many sites that push uBOL past its blocking capabilities. [0]: https://github.com/openstyles/stylus

Reddit's sponsored posts are blocked by default in uBOL when using _optimal_ (default) or _complete_ mode.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#196
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What technical difference do the social opinions of the people who write your software make? Genuinely curious.

What exactly is a "technical difference", and why is only that relevant? I am more than my interactions with software and companies, just like every other human. Why should I focus on an arbitrary subset of factors when making decisions?

Because the technical factors are what you experience when you interact with software written by a company/person?

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Android Firefox versions that are geat as well - [Ironfox]( https://github.com/ironfox-oss/IronFox ): Hardened - [Fennec]( https://f-droid.org/packages/org.mozilla.fennec_fdroid/ ): Fully FOSS

Oh, I've always used Fennec; does the main Firefox Android build not support extensions?

Firefox for Android supports extensions just fine. I use Firefox with uBlock Origin as my only browser on both mobile and desktop, and use Firefox Sync to send tabs between them. I literally disable the preinstalled Chrome on Android.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just as one example: Chrome + uBOL on Reddit will show you plenty of "Sponsored" stuff. You can use Inspector to find the offending CSS classes and then use `display: none` on them with something like Stylus[0], but not everybody wants to play that whack-a-mole game on the many sites that push uBOL past its blocking capabilities. [0]: https://github.com/openstyles/stylus

Reddit's sponsored posts are blocked by default in uBOL when using _optimal_ (default) or _complete_ mode.

I will recheck my uBOL settings, then, sir. Thank you for your work!

EDIT: I did have it set to `Complete,` so perhaps I have something else going on.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#199
post #189
post #87

Earlier quoted context omitted.

And there's nothing in MV2 that uBlock Origin needs that doesn't exist in MV3 on Firefox, unlike Chrome. This issue is completely overblown.

That's utter bullshit. The author of uBlock Origin has posted a long list of capabilities that declarativeNetRequest does not support.

Unlike Chrome, Firefox did not remove the older API.

Re: Firefox Has Integrated Brave's Adblock Engine

#200
post #199
post #189

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's utter bullshit. The author of uBlock Origin has posted a long list of capabilities that declarativeNetRequest does not support.

Unlike Chrome, Firefox did not remove the older API.

What's this supposed to mean ? OP was saying that MV3 is feature-equivalent to MV2 and would like to see MV2 support removed from Firefox just as it was from Chrome. I replied pointing out that's utterly false.
Post reply on HN