Live data from Hacker News

College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

sentinelcolorado.com

191–200 of 451 posts

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#191

Reading all these comments, I feel like US universities are a joke. I had to do all the exams in person. 100% of the grade was decided at the exam. Millions of people graduated this way and they are fine. No students were harmed in the process.

A million foreign students are studying in US universities. Millions applied. What a joke education system indeed!

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#192
post #29

The college instructor might as well ban calculators and use abacuses then.

at my university in math exams we were only allowed to use 1 specific model of calculator, and most of the exams were answered symbolically anyways, so the calculator usually was not helpful anyways.

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#193
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I personally dislike placing a heavy emphasis on exams. Assignments/projects have been consistently the most enjoyable and rewarding parts of the courses I've taken so far in university. It's a shame that they are also way more susceptible to cheating with AI.

> It's a shame that they are also way more susceptible to cheating with AI. They were more prone to cheating before AI, too. Cheating has always existed at some level, but from talking to my couple of friends who teach undergrad level courses the attitudes of students toward cheating have been changing even before AI was everywhere. They would complain about cohorts coming through where cheating was obvious and rampa…

I wonder if the companies hiring students from those universities have come to understand there’s no guarantee they learned any of the material.

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#194
post #153
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I personally dislike placing a heavy emphasis on exams. Assignments/projects have been consistently the most enjoyable and rewarding parts of the courses I've taken so far in university. It's a shame that they are also way more susceptible to cheating with AI.

The problem with exams is that everyone has a bad experience with a poorly written one. Well-written exams will have questions that test students at different levels of understanding across the whole curriculum. So a student who only understands the basics should be able to answer most of the easy questions and students who have a deeper understanding can answer the harder ones. Well-written exams should feel pretty…

Every class. Teachers think: "We want a curve, not everyone is getting an A". This pushes the teacher to ask questions not covered in the material. If they stick to what is covered it is hard to get a decent curve. So, in the end, teachers just hand out grades based on IQ, and there isn't a point of grades.

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#195
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also way more susceptible to cheating in traditional non-AI ways. And your mark ends up depending a lot on how much time you have to invest independent of how good you are at the course material. Assignments and projects are great for learning, but suck for evaluation.

is evaluation that important? ultimately if you can't do the work you're only cheating yourself in the long run...

It’s important to signaling to employers you have obtained skills useful to them.

And for most students that’s all they really care about.

If the companies stop valuing the diplomas, students will stop paying tuition to attend, and the universities eventually collapse.

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#196
post #181

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Knowledge is built on foundations. Knowing syntax in one language is necessary to be able to do anything practical, which interacts with theory. You build valuable schema of the world by iterative theory and practice.

Nah. Syntax is trivial and irrelevant for teaching CS theory.

Do you think spelling is trivial and irrelevant in a foreign language class?

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#197
After 30 seconds the site shows a fullscreen popup:

> The Sentinel not only cares deeply about bringing our readers accurate and critical news, we insist all of the crucial stories we provide are available for everyone — for free.

Thank you very much for interrupting and ruining my reading experience of your article.

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#198
post #197

After 30 seconds the site shows a fullscreen popup: > The Sentinel not only cares deeply about bringing our readers accurate and critical news, we insist all of the crucial stories we provide are available for everyone — for free. Thank you very much for interrupting and ruining my reading experience of your article.

What? And after all that money you paid them? The nerve!

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#199
post #198
post #197

After 30 seconds the site shows a fullscreen popup: > The Sentinel not only cares deeply about bringing our readers accurate and critical news, we insist all of the crucial stories we provide are available for everyone — for free. Thank you very much for interrupting and ruining my reading experience of your article.

What? And after all that money you paid them? The nerve!

Your worldview sucks. Essentially claiming that in order to receive information, you must also receive garbage useless information to brainwash you.

Re: College instructor turns to typewriters to curb AI-written work

#200
post #153
post #55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I personally dislike placing a heavy emphasis on exams. Assignments/projects have been consistently the most enjoyable and rewarding parts of the courses I've taken so far in university. It's a shame that they are also way more susceptible to cheating with AI.

The problem with exams is that everyone has a bad experience with a poorly written one. Well-written exams will have questions that test students at different levels of understanding across the whole curriculum. So a student who only understands the basics should be able to answer most of the easy questions and students who have a deeper understanding can answer the harder ones. Well-written exams should feel pretty…

Exams are kind of like interviews, at some level they are always at least a bit artificial and sometimes very artificial. I don't really think they do a good job of proving understanding but we also don't really have anything better.
Post reply on HN