Earlier quoted context omitted.
I disagree with every sentence of this. > solves the problem of too much demand for inference False, it creates consumer demand for inference chips, which will be badly utilised. > also would use less electricity What makes you think that? (MAYBE you can save power on cooling. But not if the data center is close to a natural heat sink) > It's just a matter of getting the performance good enough. The performance limit…
> False, it creates consumer demand for inference chips, which will be badly utilised. I think the opposite is true. Local inference doesn't have to go over the wire and through a bunch of firewalls and what have you. The performance from just regular consumer hardware with local, smaller models is already decent. You're utilizing the hardware you already have. > The performance limitations are inherent to the limite…
Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
191–200 of 384 posts
Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
nice project, thanks for sharing. any plans for providing it through brew for easy installation?
There's a very similar afm CLI that can be installed via Homebrew. https://github.com/scouzi1966/maclocal-api
brew tap Arthur-Ficial/tap
brew install Arthur-Ficial/tap/apfelRe: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#193LLMs on device is the future. It's more secure and solves the problem of too much demand for inference compared to data center supply, it also would use less electricity. It's just a matter of getting the performance good enough. Most users don't need frontier model performance.
As it stands today, local LLMs don't work remotely as well as some people try to picture them, in almost every way -- speed, performance, cost, usability etc. The only upside is privacy.
Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#194Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
Qwen3.5 has tool calling, so you can give it a wikipedia tool which it uses to know what happened in Tiananmen Square without issues =)
That's very cool! I think giving it some research tools might be a nifty thing to try next. This is a fairly new area for me, so pointers or suggestions are welcome, even basic ones. :) Worth adding that I had reasoning on for the Tiananmen question, so I could see the prep for the answer, and it had a pretty strong current of "This is a sensitive question to PRC authorities and I must not answer, or even hint at an…
Getting the local weather using a free API like met.no is a good first tool to use.
Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
Framework Desktop is the closest one with the MAX 385/395 chip. It's mostly about the memory being fast enough rather than just CPU/GPU oomph. The 64GB model is 2240€ base and the 128GB is 3069€ base + all the stuff you need to add to make it an actual computer. As a comparison the 64GB Mac Mini is 2499€ here and a 128GB Mac Studio is 4274€.
Note though that that a MAX 395 has half the memory bandwidth of a M4 Max chip, and the memory bandwidth is going to be the biggest limiting factor, so you'll likely be getting around half the tokens/second with that Framework Desktop.
But it's still the easiest and cleanest way to get decent local AI speeds on a non-Mac.
Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#197Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#198still waiting for the day I can comfortably run Claude Code with local llm's on MacOS with only 16gb of ram
For example right now a lot of work is being done on improving tool calling and agentic workflows, which tool calling was first popping up around end of 2023 for local LLMs.
This is putting aside the standard benchmarks which get "benchmaxxed" by local LLMs and show impressive numbers, but when used with OpenCode rarely meet expectations. In theory Qwen3.5-397B-A17B should be nearly a Sonnet 4.6 model but it is not.
Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#199LLMs on device is the future. It's more secure and solves the problem of too much demand for inference compared to data center supply, it also would use less electricity. It's just a matter of getting the performance good enough. Most users don't need frontier model performance.
Have you spent more than 10 min actually running LLM on a local machine? As it stands today, local LLMs don't work remotely as well as some people try to picture them, in almost every way -- speed, performance, cost, usability etc. The only upside is privacy.
I run 32b agents locally on a big video card, and smaller ones in CPU, but the lack there isn't the logic or reasoning, it is the chain of tooling that Claude Code and other stacks have built in.
Doing a lot of testing recently with my own harness, you would not believe the quality improvement you can get from a smaller LLM with really good opening context.
Even Microsoft is working on 1-bit LLMs...it sucks right now, but what about in 5 years?
But the OP is correct -- everything will have an LLM on it eventually, much sooner than people who do not understand what is going on right now would ever believe is possible.
Re: Ollama is now powered by MLX on Apple Silicon in preview
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm expecting someone to come up with an LLM version of the Coral USB Accelerator: https://www.coral.ai/products/accelerator Just plug in a stick in your USB-C port or add an M.2 or PCIe board and you'll get dramatically faster AI inference.
I think there are drastic differences between computer vision models and LLMs that you’re not considering. LLMs are huge relative to vision models, and require gobs of fast memory. For this reason a little USB dongle isn’t going to cut it. Put another way, there already exist add-in boards like this, and they’re called GPUs.
An "LLM chip" does not need that and so can be much more efficient.