Earlier quoted context omitted.
You aren’t alone: https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/working-defini...
This is me. It's like a super power.
VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
191–200 of 234 posts
Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#192I bought an Amiga in the early 90's and enjoyed it immensely. Commodore went under and Amiga died. I bought BeOS in the late 90's and enjoyed it immensely like a breath of fresh air in a sewage pipe. BeOS died. With my track record I really, really should've bought Windows. Twice, to make sure.
This post is really bringing me back! I knew talk of BeOS would stir up all us old heads. I think what we're all really nostalgic for is the days of tinkering with computers. When things lacked polish, and people put real effort into making their system nice. I remember corrupting my family computer hard drive trying to get a Linux dual-boot setup. Good times!
From the website: "Genode is based on a recursive system structure. Each program runs in a dedicated sandbox and gets granted only those access rights and resources that are needed for its specific purpose. Programs can create and manage sub-sandboxes out of their own resources, thereby forming hierarchies where policies can be applied at each level. The framework provides mechanisms to let programs communicate with each other and trade their resources, but only in strictly-defined manners. Thanks to this rigid regime, the attack surface of security-critical functions can be reduced by orders of magnitude compared to contemporary operating systems."
Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#193Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#194Earlier quoted context omitted.
OS/2 Warp was out before Windows 95, and better.
I ran OS/2 Warp and was a fan of it... But to say that it was simply "better" than Windows 95 is a bridge too far. It had its strengths (rock solid multitasking) but also plenty of rough edges.
OS/2 was better. BeOS was better. Linux was better. Windows NT was better.
Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#195Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
I suspect it was a freak occurence, but I actually had incredible luck running Haiku on an old laptop back in the day. It was incredibly fast, and just about all the amenities you'd expect worked with no or minimal intervention.
Even running from an HDD?
Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#197Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
^this, plus being able to play 3-4 quicktime videos at the same time smoked everyones brains around me. Using mac os 8/9 was a several times a day cursor freezing up and having to reboot. win95 was even worse
I think I'm remembering this correctly - couldn't you move the window while the video inside continued to play?
Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
And much better option, running the real deal, instead of some compatibility layer.
And things such as ruby don't work on it. Well, what shall I say? The "best" ideas get beaten when in practically already works very well - aka Linux. People need to compare to Linux and if there are failure points, they need to fix it. Haiku keeps on failing at core considerations. If you look at guides, they recommend to "run in qemu". Well, that is a fever dream. They need to focus on real hardware. And they need…
Re: VitruvianOS – Desktop Linux Inspired by the BeOS
#200So this is a lighter weight alternative to other Linux desktops?
Well, it can't run X or Wayland apps, so I wouldn't call it an alternative to those. An alternative to Haiku maybe.