Live data from Hacker News

Why I Joined OpenAI

brendangregg.com

191–200 of 236 posts

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#191

To answer a few people at once: I did mention compensation as a factor in the post, but I didn't elaborate details, so easy to miss. Comp is important of course, but so are the other factors. It feels like I can't go for a day without reading about the cost of AI datacenters in the news, and I can do something about it.

Consider your a engineer equivalent of a DoT engineer and your job will be to add just one more lane.

You arnt going to stop the excesses.

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#192
post #174
post #132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could US tech companies stop making the world a better place? Like how Airbnb made housing markets "better" and and Facebook made politics "better"? We barely have anything left as regular people as our new feudal lords capture everything they can.

airBnB made a very constrained market more efficient, the downsides are classic NIMBY factors. (which are important, but also nothing has been solved in cities that outlawed AirBnB.) on the other hand Facebook made the internet hate machine more efficient :(

Why are NIMBY's to blame for hidden cleaning costs and hidden cameras in/near bathrooms?

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#193
It’s so jarring to hear this reality-detached writing style coming from someone who’s otherwise a great systems thinker.

This is like my worst nightmare as a systems engineer: that years of navigating bureaucracy at a place like Intel slowly brainrots me into prioritizing politics and self-promotion over the technical truth.

I hope this is just PR reflex and not an actual loss of grounding.

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#195

This article is so full of itself I can hardly stand to read it. I had to just sort of skim it instead. Sorry! This style just doesn't do it for me.

Not the first time either. See this person's previous blog when leaving his earlier company. Lots of Kim kardashian vibe of self inflated self worth.

Brendan known to be an exact opposite person by the way.

A quite funny post from his blog on this topic: https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2021-06-04/an-unbelievable...

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Reminds me of the TechCrunch episode of Silicon Valley TV show. Everyone was there to make the big buck but all collectively pretended they were doing their work for the good of humankind. This guy and Rob Pike should have a talk.

Why Rob Pike in particular? Most stuff I've read from him was nuts-and-bolts technical.

I assume the Rob Pike mention was in reference to this:

https://skyview.social/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbsky.app%2Fprofile...

He apparently isn't the biggest fan of AI.

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I meet people like this irl. I block them.

Do you think some of them are honestly like that? I can never quite figure out how many levels of irony^H^H^H delusion there are. Spoken as a person that would totally have his job, but just because it most certainly pays plenty and is likely fun to do.

People who use AI to write stuff meant to be read by people is L.

Idc if it’s a text message or some low stakes shit. Or marketing spam even because I get it. But this is where I draw the line.

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not the first time either. See this person's previous blog when leaving his earlier company. Lots of Kim kardashian vibe of self inflated self worth.

Brendan known to be an exact opposite person by the way. A quite funny post from his blog on this topic: https://www.brendangregg.com/blog/2021-06-04/an-unbelievable...

“Known to be” then proceed to write the exact opposite type of article on his personal blog. Maybe he wants to be recognized another way

Re: Why I Joined OpenAI

#200
post #193

It’s so jarring to hear this reality-detached writing style coming from someone who’s otherwise a great systems thinker. This is like my worst nightmare as a systems engineer: that years of navigating bureaucracy at a place like Intel slowly brainrots me into prioritizing politics and self-promotion over the technical truth. I hope this is just PR reflex and not an actual loss of grounding.

imo the engineers who stay in their nuts-and-bolts lane - those are the ones who are at a real risk of 'brainrot', who sometimes at the ripe age of 50+ continue to misunderstand what motivates management, the executives, seemingly unable to model anyones minds other than their own (or that of a very predictable entity, like a computer.)

infact, you could argue that politics is in some sense the biggest, most complex dynamic system of them all, and thus poses the greatest 'engineering' challenge. and it invariably involves promotion of oneself, or an idea, or a certain direction, with real trade-offs that have positive impact on some people, and negative on others.

Post reply on HN