Live data from Hacker News

Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

techcrunch.com

191–200 of 813 posts

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#191
post #157
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

With above-average human reflexes, the kid would have been hit at 14mph instead of 6mph. About 5x more kinetic energy.

But would a human be driving at 17 in a school zone during drop off hours? Id argue a human may be slower exactly because of this scenario

> would a human be driving at 17 in a school zone during drop off hours?

In my experience in California, always and yes.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#192
post #69
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It depends on the situation, and we need more data/video. But if there are a bunch of children milling about an elementary school in a chaotic situation with lots of double parking, 17 mph is too fast, and the Waymo should have been driving more conservatively.

Whoa! You're allowed to double park outside a school over there?!

More like standing, and quite common in a school zone.

I would not race at 17 MPH through such an area. Of course, Waymo will find a way to describe themselves as the heroes of this situation.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#193
post #168

> Waymo said its robotaxi struck the child at six miles per hour, after braking “hard” from around 17 miles per hour. The young pedestrian “suddenly entered the roadway from behind a tall SUV, moving directly into our vehicle’s path,” the company said in its blog post. Waymo said its vehicle “immediately detected the individual as soon as they began to emerge from behind the stopped vehicle.” As this is based on dete…

"Oh that obstructing object doesn't look like a child? Gun it, YOLO." Lmao.

I suspect the cars are trying to avoid running into anything, as that's generally considered bad.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#194
post #183
post #168

> Waymo said its robotaxi struck the child at six miles per hour, after braking “hard” from around 17 miles per hour. The young pedestrian “suddenly entered the roadway from behind a tall SUV, moving directly into our vehicle’s path,” the company said in its blog post. Waymo said its vehicle “immediately detected the individual as soon as they began to emerge from behind the stopped vehicle.” As this is based on dete…

You're right: a quick search shows that pedestrian fatalities are 43% higher on Halloween.

That's probably more a function of more people being in the road than people not understanding what object they're about to hit.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#195
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

17 mph is way too fast near a school if it's around the time children are getting out (or in).

The limit is 20 MPH in Washington state, in California the default is 25 MPH, but is going to 20 MPH soon and can be further lowered to 15 MPH with special considerations. The real killer here is the crazy American on street parking, which limits visibility of both pedestrians and oncoming vehicles. Every school should be a no street parking zone. But parents are going to whine they can't load and unload their kids c…

If it had no parking, then the parents would be parked somewhere else and loading and unloading their kids there, and then that would need to be a no-parking zone too.

I guess you could keep doing that until kids just walk to and from school?

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#196
post #168

> Waymo said its robotaxi struck the child at six miles per hour, after braking “hard” from around 17 miles per hour. The young pedestrian “suddenly entered the roadway from behind a tall SUV, moving directly into our vehicle’s path,” the company said in its blog post. Waymo said its vehicle “immediately detected the individual as soon as they began to emerge from behind the stopped vehicle.” As this is based on dete…

These systems don't discriminate on whether the object is a child. If an object enters the path of the vehicle, the lidar should spot it immediately and the car should brake.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Waymo hits a kid? Ban the tech immediately, obviously it needs more work. > Waymo hits a kid? Well if it was a human driver the kid might well have been dead rather than bruised. These can be true at the same time. Waymo is held to a significantly higher standard than human drivers.

> Waymo is held to a significantly higher standard than human drivers. They have to be, as a machine can not be held accountable for a decision.

> They have to be, as a machine can not be held accountable for a decision

This logic applies equally to all cars, which are machines. Waymo has its decision makers one more step removed than human drivers. But it’s not a good axiom to base any theory of liability on.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The limit is 20 MPH in Washington state, in California the default is 25 MPH, but is going to 20 MPH soon and can be further lowered to 15 MPH with special considerations. The real killer here is the crazy American on street parking, which limits visibility of both pedestrians and oncoming vehicles. Every school should be a no street parking zone. But parents are going to whine they can't load and unload their kids c…

This isn't universal. The schools in our Montana town have pickup lanes and short term parking areas for pickup. Stopping on the road isn't allowed.

Same for my tiny town. Stopping on the road is 100% not allowed, and parking isn't allowed there either. The school has its own parking area to park and pick up/drop off kids, and cars in there creep at 2 or 3 MPH.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#199

And before the argument "Self driving is acceptable so long as the accident/risk is lower than with human drivers" can I please get that out of the way: No it's not. Self driving needs to be orders of magnitude safer for us to acknowledge it. If they're merely as safe or slightly safer than humans we will never accept it. Becase humans have a "skin in the game". If you drive drunk, at least you're likely to be in the…

> Self driving needs to be orders of magnitude safer for us to acknowledge it. If they're merely as safe or slightly safer than humans we will never accept it

It’s already accepted. It’s already here. And Waymo is the safest in the set—we’re accepting objectively less-safe systems, too.

Re: Waymo robotaxi hits a child near an elementary school in Santa Monica

#200
post #153

I was just dropping my kids off at their elementary school in Santa Monica, but not at Grant Elementary where this happened. While it's third-hand, word on the local parent chat is that the parent dropped their kid off on the opposite side of the street from Grant. Even though there was a crossing guard, the kid ran behind a car an ran right out in to the street. If those rumors are correct, I'll say the kid's/family…

I do not like the phase "it's the kid's fault" for a kid being hit by a robot-car.

It is never a 6 year old's fault if they get struck by a robot.

Post reply on HN