Live data from Hacker News

A guide to local coding models

aiforswes.com

191–200 of 363 posts

Re: A guide to local coding models

#191

I don’t think I’ve ever read an article where the reason I knew the author was completely wrong about all of their assumptions was that they admitted it themselves and left the bad assumptions in the article. The above paragraph is meant to be a compliment. But justifying it based on keeping his Mac for five years is crazy. At the rate things are moving, coding models are going to get so much better in a year, the ga…

Yes, it’s worth it, if only because that Mac will be worth $20k in 3 months…

Re: A guide to local coding models

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use local models + openrouter free ones. My monthly spend on ai models is I'm not cheap, just ahead of the curve. With the collapse in inference cost, everything will be this eventually I'll basically do $ man tool | or even $ cat source | Things I used to do intensively I now do lazily. I've even made a IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en database of my manpages with chroma and then I can just ask my local documentatio…

> I'll basically do $ man tool | or even $ cat source | Could you please elaborate on this? Do I get this right that you can set up your your command line so that you can pipe something to a command that sends this something together with a question to an LLM? Or did you just mean that metaphorically? Sorry if this is a stupid question.

I'm not the OP, but I did build a tool that I use in the same way: https://github.com/scottyeager/Pal

Actually for many cases the LLM already knows enough. For more obscure cases, piping in a --help output is also sometimes enough.

Re: A guide to local coding models

#193
post #4

> I realized I looked at this more from the angle of a hobbiest paying for these coding tools. Someone doing little side projects—not someone in a production setting. I did this because I see a lot of people signing up for $100/mo or $200/mo coding subscriptions for personal projects when they likely don’t need to. Are people really doing that? If that's you, know that you can get a LONG way on the $20/month plans fr…

If you're a hobbyist doing a side project, I'd start with Google and use anti-gravity, then only move to OpenAI when the project gets too complex for Gemini to handle things.

Re: A guide to local coding models

#195
post #4

> I realized I looked at this more from the angle of a hobbiest paying for these coding tools. Someone doing little side projects—not someone in a production setting. I did this because I see a lot of people signing up for $100/mo or $200/mo coding subscriptions for personal projects when they likely don’t need to. Are people really doing that? If that's you, know that you can get a LONG way on the $20/month plans fr…

I regularly hit my limits on the $200/mo Codex plan (using medium reasoning). (I am using everything for production - these aren't toy ideas.)

Re: A guide to local coding models

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I recently bought the $200/mo OpenAI subscription but could barely use 10% of it This entire comment is confusing. Why are you buying the $200/month plan if you’re only using 10% of it? I rotate providers. My comment above applies to all of them. It really depends on the work you’re doing and the codebase. There are tasks where I can get decent results and barely make the usage bar move. There are other tasks where…

I got it to try Atlas, their agentic browser, before it was open to Plus users. I convinced myself that I could use the additional capacity to multi-task and push through hard core problems without worrying about quota limits. For context, this was a few months ago when GPT 5 was new and I was used to constantly hitting o3 limits. It was an experiment to see if the higher plan could pay for itself. It most certainly…

To use up the Pro tier plan you must close the loop so to speak - so that Codex knows how to test the quality of its output and incrementally inch toward its goals. This can be harder or easier depending on your project.

You should also queue up many "continue ur work" type messages.

Re: A guide to local coding models

#198
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This older HN thread shows R1 running on a ~$2k box using ~512 GB of system RAM, no GPU, at ~3.5-4.25 TPS: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42897205 If you scale that setup and add a couple of used RTX 3090s with heavy memory offloading, you can technically run something in the K2 class.

Is 4 TPS actually useful for anything? That's around 350,000 tokens in a day. I don't track my Claude/Codex usage, but Kilocode with the free Grok model does and I'm using between 3.3M and 50M tokens in a day (plus additional usage in Claude + Codex + Mistral Vibe + Amp Coder) I'm trying to imagine a use case where I'd want this. Maybe running some small coding task overnight? But it just doesn't seem very useful.

3.5-50M tokens a day? What are you doing with all those tokens?

Yesterday I asked Claude to write one function. I didn't ask it to do anything else because it wouldn't have been helpful.

Re: A guide to local coding models

#199
post #108

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I use local models + openrouter free ones. My monthly spend on ai models is I'm not cheap, just ahead of the curve. With the collapse in inference cost, everything will be this eventually I'll basically do $ man tool | or even $ cat source | Things I used to do intensively I now do lazily. I've even made a IEITYuan/Yuan-embedding-2.0-en database of my manpages with chroma and then I can just ask my local documentatio…

Is your RAG manpages thing on github somewhere? I was thinking about doing something like that (it's high on my to-do list but I haven't actually done anything with llms yet.)

Not the OP, but I did release my source :D https://github.com/scottyeager/Pal

My tool can read stdin, send it to an LLM, and do a couple nice things with the reply. Not exactly RAG, but most man pages fit into the context window so it's okay.

Re: A guide to local coding models

#200
post #4

> I realized I looked at this more from the angle of a hobbiest paying for these coding tools. Someone doing little side projects—not someone in a production setting. I did this because I see a lot of people signing up for $100/mo or $200/mo coding subscriptions for personal projects when they likely don’t need to. Are people really doing that? If that's you, know that you can get a LONG way on the $20/month plans fr…

Claude 4.5 Opus on Claude Code's $20 plan is funny because you get about 2-3 prompts on any nontrivial task before you hit the session limit. If I wasn't only using it for side projects I'd have to cough up the $200 out of necessity.

Just get the $100 plan? (5X). I code most of the day and hit the 5-hour limit a couple of times a week, and never hit the weekly limit.
Post reply on HN