191–200 of 256 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Should young adults be allowed to violate copyright and no one else? The damages caused seem far worse than an LLM being able to reproduce song lyrics. Is it simply "we like college kids" and "we hate OpenAI"? that dictates this? I'm ready, hit me with the nuance.
What damages? You can learn lyrics by listening the song.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Should young adults be allowed to violate copyright and no one else? The damages caused seem far worse than an LLM being able to reproduce song lyrics. Is it simply "we like college kids" and "we hate OpenAI"? that dictates this? I'm ready, hit me with the nuance.
What damages? You can learn lyrics by listening the song.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
All AI companies know they're breaking the law. They all have prompts effectively saying "Don't show that we broke the law!". That we continue to have tech companies consistently breaking the law and nothing happens is an indictment of our current economy.
Training on copyright is not illegal. Even in the lawsuit against anthropic it was found to be fair use. Pirating material is a violation of copyright, which some labs have done, but that has nothing to do with training AI and everything to do with piracy.
'Would this product have the same value without the copyrighted works?'
If yes then it's not derivative. If no then it is.
I am torn because on one hand, fuck record companies. On the other hand, fuck AI companies torrenting, stealing and defrauding.
Copyright law continues to stifle innovation. The DMCA needs to be abolished, and we need to entirely rethink our modern economic system with respect to creative industries (including software development). The cat is not going back in the bag. We are sitting on the precipice of the greatest technological advancement in history, and rent-seeking industry titans have convinced us that we must stop this unstoppable tec…
Prior to the current tech bros economy one of the number one ways average people moved up to being rich in the USA was all enabled purely by the copyright/patents laws protections you want to do away with.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
What damages? You can learn lyrics by listening the song.
Sometimes, sometimes not. https://www.kissthisguy.com/
... Alright?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can modify the output but the underlying model is always susceptible to jail breaks. A method I tried a couple months ago to reliably get it to explain to me how to cook meth step by step still works. I’m not gonna share it, you just have to take my word on this.
Why is this so problematic? You can read all this stuff in old papers and patents that are available in the web. And if you are not capable to do this you will likely not succeed with the chatgpt instructions.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know nuance takes the fun out of most online discussions, but there's a qualitative difference between a bunch of college kids downloading mp3's on a torrent site and a $500 billion company who's goal among other things is to become the primary access point to all things digital.
Should young adults be allowed to violate copyright and no one else? The damages caused seem far worse than an LLM being able to reproduce song lyrics. Is it simply "we like college kids" and "we hate OpenAI"? that dictates this? I'm ready, hit me with the nuance.
A corporation who pirates, is more likely to pirate en masse everything that they can get their hands on, in an ongoing manner, and throw everything they can at contesting their right to do so in court.
Can't they just ask for copies of the lyrics they are not allowed to use and s/lyrics//g the training set? I imagine the volume of text that will be removed would be relatively miniscule.