Live data from Hacker News

Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

suno.com

191–200 of 318 posts

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#191
I am a paid user for months. Actually the most impressive upgrade from 4.5 to V5 is being able to get MIDI. but for now the ui is still very chaotic and buggy. As a VC-backed company, while they're able to train models thanks to VC Moeny, they're also clearly not enough to sustain their income simply by becoming the new Ableton. Balancing the needs of professionals with those of the general public is a complex proposition. Are ordinary people really willing to pay such high monthly fees to produce music?

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#192

Tools like Suno are fundamentally enabling. I'm about 40 years old and never "had the music" - not for lack of trying (music lessons at a young age)... but could never carry a tune or keep rhythm. I suppose its what being dyslexic feels like. If I were educated in a culture where music was fundamentally as important as reading or math, I suppose would have spent enough hours on it to eventually be passable... but I g…

> learning suno is no different than learning guitar It most definitely is different and you’ve proven it with your own post. Guitar takes a long time to get to a place where you can produce the sounds you hear in your head. Suno gives you instant gratification. Look, if it gives you pleasure to make Suno music then you should do it, but if you think having an ai steal a melody and add it to your songs counts is the…

I agree with this.

There are drawbacks to being a skilled (trained/practiced) musician. You specialize in one instrument, and tend to have your creativity guided by its strengths/weaknesses.

I think that soon, some very accomplished musicians will learn to leverage tools like Suno, but they aren't in the majority yet. We're still in the "vibe-coding" phase of AI music generation.

We saw this happen with CG. When it started, engineers did most of the creating, and we got less-than-stellar results[0].

Then, CG became its own community and vocation, and true artists started to dominate.

Some of the CG art that I see nowadays, is every bit as impressive as the Great Masters.

We'll see that, when AI music generation comes into its own. It's not there, yet.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wTP2RUD_cL0

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#193

While I like using AI for assisting with repetitive programming, I can’t help but feel sorry for my producer and illustrator friends who are now having to compete with generated tools. Is it snobby of me to look down upon art that is created using these tools as lesser because the human did not make every tiny decision going into a peice? That a persons taste and talent is no longer fully used to produce something an…

You as a human chose to write this very common opinion and even include writing errors like the following > That a persons taste and talent is no longer fully used to produce something and for someone reason to me what is what makes the art impressive and meaningful? Human output isn't sacred. yes this is snobbery, a useless feeling of superiority.

absolutely, why should I go outside and touch grass when suno can do it for me?

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#194

Tools like Suno are fundamentally enabling. I'm about 40 years old and never "had the music" - not for lack of trying (music lessons at a young age)... but could never carry a tune or keep rhythm. I suppose its what being dyslexic feels like. If I were educated in a culture where music was fundamentally as important as reading or math, I suppose would have spent enough hours on it to eventually be passable... but I g…

> learning suno is no different than learning guitar It most definitely is different and you’ve proven it with your own post. Guitar takes a long time to get to a place where you can produce the sounds you hear in your head. Suno gives you instant gratification. Look, if it gives you pleasure to make Suno music then you should do it, but if you think having an ai steal a melody and add it to your songs counts is the…

> having an ai steal a melody and add it

The fact people still think this is how these models work is astonishing

Even if that were true, sampling is an artform and is behind one of the most popular and succesful genres today (hip hop). So is DJ'ing or is that also not a skill?

The same puritanism that claimed jazz wasn't music, then rap wasn't music, then EDM wasn't music, blah blah

Gatekeepers of what is and isn't art always end up wrong and crotchety on the other side. It's lame and played out.

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> My 8 year old nephew was cranking out "songs" in Suno within an hour of being introduced to it. Reminds me of when parents were super impressed that their 3-year old could use an iPad. You imply "it is Prompt -> Song" but in reality it is "Prompt -> Song -> Reflection -> New Prompt -> New Song.." It is a dialogue. And in a dialogue you can get some places where neither of you could go alone. As software developers…

clicking on a button until you like what you hear is not "making music". I have nothing against these tools, but the hubris of the people using them is insane

No, the hubris of people deciding they can define what music is is insane

Banging two sticks together is music. Get off your high horse.

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#196
post #153

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> My 8 year old nephew was cranking out "songs" in Suno within an hour of being introduced to it. Reminds me of when parents were super impressed that their 3-year old could use an iPad. You imply "it is Prompt -> Song" but in reality it is "Prompt -> Song -> Reflection -> New Prompt -> New Song.." It is a dialogue. And in a dialogue you can get some places where neither of you could go alone. As software developers…

It’s really not. It’s like having interdimensional Spotify where you can describe any song and they will pull it up from whatever dimension made it and play it for you. It may empower you as a consumer but it does not make you a creator.

And so sampling, dj'ing, these aren't skills? This isn't music?

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#197
post #117

Tools like Suno are fundamentally enabling. I'm about 40 years old and never "had the music" - not for lack of trying (music lessons at a young age)... but could never carry a tune or keep rhythm. I suppose its what being dyslexic feels like. If I were educated in a culture where music was fundamentally as important as reading or math, I suppose would have spent enough hours on it to eventually be passable... but I g…

> "learning Suno" is no different than "learning guitar" What an insanely disrespectful take.

It's only disrespectful if you're a gatekeeper.

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#198

Tools like Suno are fundamentally enabling. I'm about 40 years old and never "had the music" - not for lack of trying (music lessons at a young age)... but could never carry a tune or keep rhythm. I suppose its what being dyslexic feels like. If I were educated in a culture where music was fundamentally as important as reading or math, I suppose would have spent enough hours on it to eventually be passable... but I g…

Love the passionate replies! I think I especially agree with this comment:

>> think that soon, some very accomplished musicians will learn to leverage tools like Suno, but they aren't in the majority yet. We're still in the "vibe-coding" phase of AI music generation. We saw this happen with CG. When it started, engineers did most of the creating, and we got less-than-stellar results[0]. Then, CG became its own community and vocation, and true artists started to dominate.

Hey its likely not going to be me, but let's be real - any user of this technology who has gone beyond the "type in a prompt and look i got a silly song about poop" stage will probably agree - someone's going to produce some bangers using this tech. It's inevitable and if you don't think so it's likely you haven't done anything more than "low-effort" work on these platforms. "Low effort" work - which a majority of AI swill us - is going to suck, whether its AI or not.

And while I have the forum, I do want to make another point. I pay more for a month for Suno than Spotify ($25 vs $9). Suno/Udio etc: do what you need to to make sure the artists and catalogues are getting compensated... as an user I would pay even more knowing that was settled.

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> learning suno is no different than learning guitar It most definitely is different and you’ve proven it with your own post. Guitar takes a long time to get to a place where you can produce the sounds you hear in your head. Suno gives you instant gratification. Look, if it gives you pleasure to make Suno music then you should do it, but if you think having an ai steal a melody and add it to your songs counts is the…

I agree with this. There are drawbacks to being a skilled (trained/practiced) musician. You specialize in one instrument, and tend to have your creativity guided by its strengths/weaknesses. I think that soon, some very accomplished musicians will learn to leverage tools like Suno, but they aren't in the majority yet. We're still in the "vibe-coding" phase of AI music generation. We saw this happen with CG. When it s…

>Some of the CG art that I see nowadays, is every bit as impressive as the Great Masters.

Really? Except the minor part in which a great master spent months to years creating one of his works, instead of a literally mindless digital system putting it together (in digital, no pigments here) instantly.

The technology is impressive, sure, but I see nothing artistically impressive about it, or emotionally satisfying about the utter lack of world and life of creation it lacks.

Re: Suno Studio, a Generative AI DAW

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

clicking on a button until you like what you hear is not "making music". I have nothing against these tools, but the hubris of the people using them is insane

Refining a request that generates music, is "making music" however you slice it.

Trying to convince some tech people about how artistic creation works, and why it's more than just the right amount of "optimization" of bits for rapid results, is about as pointless as trying to make a chimpanzee understand the intricacies of Bach. The reductiveness of some of you is amusing, but also grotesque in the context of what art should mean for human experience.
Post reply on HN