Live data from Hacker News

Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

reddit.com

191–200 of 365 posts

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#191
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Haven't Google also famously faked a phone call with an AI some years ago for an event? https://www.axios.com/2018/05/17/google-ai-demo-questions

> When you call a business, the person picking up the phone almost always identifies the business itself (and sometimes gives their own name as well). But that didn't happen when the Google assistant called these "real" businesses: That's the whole argument?

No, because if you read the article you'd see that there's more, like the "business" not asking for customer information or the PR people being cagey when asked for details/confirmation.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#192
post #2

There is a second part that is equally bad, but with Zuck: https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1nkbqyk/...

Every added drop of his flop sweat during this disaster just gives me that much more life. Amazing.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#193
post #2

There is a second part that is equally bad, but with Zuck: https://old.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/1nkbqyk/...

Big tech has spent $155bn on AI this year. It’s about to spend hundreds of billions more https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/02/big-tech-...

Maybe it's a 5D chess move to generate investor pressure on them to not spend that much.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Big tech has spent $155bn on AI this year. It’s about to spend hundreds of billions more https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/02/big-tech-...

Maybe it's a 5D chess move to generate investor pressure on them to not spend that much.

Nah, more like a 1D chess move. Investors will pay them to invest in AI, so invest in AI, make the stock go up, sell, and leave the dumb investors holding the bag.

2D chess if they're smart: start a new company that competes with the one they just sold to dumb investors. Jack Dorsey is particularly fond of this move.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#196
post #142
post #135

So much negativity. I’m just excited that our industry is lead by optimists and our culture enables our corporations to invest huge sums into taking us forward technologically. Meta could have just done a stock buyback but instead they made a computer that can talk, see, solve problems and paint virtual things into the real world in front of your eyes! I commend them on attempting a live demo.

Yes, the mocking, gleeful negativity really does make me concerned that this place is becoming Reddit. The fact that the highest upvoted post on this thread is just a link to Reddit isn't doing much to help me feel better. And I've been here for at least a decade, so I don't think this is the noob illusion.

I've been here for over a decade. It has become very reddit like in the past few years.

I want to get into YC just to use and browse Bookface instead.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#198

This does not deter me from possibly buying one. The concept is pretty cool and appealing to those who want a distraction free lifestyle. Even if there's a screen in front of you at all times, at least you won't need to hold something in your hands to be able to operate it. That alone is a significant win.

Right, strapping a screen to your face is less distracting then having a device you can turn off and shove in your pocket...

My point is that the device that you keep in your pocket is one that you must take out with your hand and operate with your hand such that you cannot perform its primary functions without using hands. It's true that the Ray-Ban Meta Display can be controlled with hand gestures but doing so is apparently optional. Being able to control and consume content from a smart device while having your hands free to multitask is a big deal.

There are so many activities and professions where your hands get dirty and touching a smartphone without washing them would be a bad idea. An auto mechanic could use these glasses to look up information about things they see inside of an engine without having to clean the oil from their hands. A chef could respond to messages about their food delivery without having to drop what they're doing and go sanitize. Anytime I do dirty work outside, I can use this to access smart features without the risk of dirt filling my smartphone case, my smartwatch getting destroyed in a tight situation, or drenching either of them in sweat.

Furthermore, a phone (or a smart watch) is not meant to be used at face level, meaning folks typically look down to use them, and this can lead to extended periods of bad posture resulting in head, neck, and spine problems. My X-ray shows I have bone spurs on the vertebrae of my neck because I look down at screens too much (according to my chiropractor). A smart device that's designed to be used in a way that aligns with good posture habits is absolutely needed.

I hope smart glasses take off and I commented Meta for taking them this far.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#199
post #181
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> confused the AI. I will die on this hill. It isn’t AI. You can’t confuse it.

Ok, you’ve piqued my interest. What’s required in order for something to be genuinely confused?

Capacity for will, I would imagine the OP may respond. I'm not averse to the position.

Re: Meta’s live demo fails; “AI” recording plays before the actor takes the steps

#200
post #147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Big tech has spent $155bn on AI this year. It’s about to spend hundreds of billions more https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/aug/02/big-tech-...

They classify a lot of it as R&D and write it off taxes. Taxpayers foot the bill.

> They classify a lot of it as R&D and write it off taxes. Taxpayers foot the bill.

Taxpayers do not "foot the bill" for corporations reducing their tax obligations via "write-offs".

See: https://accountinginsights.org/what-does-write-it-off-mean-f...

Post reply on HN