Live data from Hacker News

What even is 'adult' content? [NSFW]

worldofmatthew.com

191–192 of 192 posts

Re: What even is 'adult' content? [NSFW]

#191
post #100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Graphic violence generally is considered adult content. Let’s not pretend slapstick comedy is the same as graphic violence. Furthermore, you/kids definitely see cartoons where one character is enamored with another (heart eyes jumping out of sockets) and pursues that character for the entirety of the episode.

"Graphic violence" meant "violence in images" in my lifetime. Because so many people "learn" words by guessing their meaning from context, it now means what Anthony Burgess called "ultraviolence" in A Clockwork Orange. Cartoons have already had several re-thinking of what's appropriate as norms have changed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censored_Eleven

> "Graphic violence" meant "violence in images" in my lifetime.

I doubt that

> graphic (adj.) "vivid, describing accurately ," 1660s (graphically "vividly" is from 1570s) [...] Meaning "pertaining to drawing" is from 1756.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/graphic

Re: What even is 'adult' content? [NSFW]

#192
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> it is funny to see in particular Americans when you talk about nude beaches or mixed saunas and the general Freikörperkultur (lit: free body culture) that was so common and still has carried over How is general nudity of adult men considered by those participants? I always assumed that my nakedness would be perceived as a display of mateability, and I am concerned that my penis size relative to other men would redu…

Most women are not interested in penis size. (Though some are, obviously.) At a normal nude beach, with all age groups represented, people don't show off an erect penis. (Though there are beaches where that happens.) Median erect penis length is about 13-14 cm and I don't think there's credible evidence for the median varying much between countries of Europe and North America. (Though there is some evidence for a sma…

It does to some extent. At least your data is similar to what I've read.

I think the problem is that even if I was one standard deviation above the mean, that's still only about the 68% percentile. So it's expected that 3 of every 10 dudes would be better endowded than me, and I'm sure nude beaches bias in sample towards the more well endowed. So likely I won't be laughed at but won't be a genetic prize, and I'm not sure I'm confident enough (or ever will be) to accept that as public knowledge.

Post reply on HN