Live data from Hacker News

Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

engadget.com

191–200 of 344 posts

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#191

Now there are more avenues for Samsung to shove bloatware down our throats. I have a modestly high-end home theater and it is utterly maddening waiting for devices to “boot” and “handshake”. And after the wait, I’m presented with another “User Agreement” to sign that insists on shoveling ads down my throat and harvesting data. How much do you have to pay for a quick boot, no ads, and a private movie or music experien…

[flagged]

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#192

Now there are more avenues for Samsung to shove bloatware down our throats. I have a modestly high-end home theater and it is utterly maddening waiting for devices to “boot” and “handshake”. And after the wait, I’m presented with another “User Agreement” to sign that insists on shoveling ads down my throat and harvesting data. How much do you have to pay for a quick boot, no ads, and a private movie or music experien…

Thorens 166 turntable, Fischer tube amp from a flea market, and homemade speakers. I left that stuff in storage many years ago and have no idea where it is now. Come to think of it, that had a boot delay too (waiting for the tubes to warm up) but it never really bothered me.

If you aren't running direct-heated triodes, leave the heaters on and switch off the B+ :)

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#194
post #81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> 90+% of the things people complain about would no longer be a problem if they got a traditional A/V receiver, plugged all their sources such as streaming boxes and game consoles into the receiver, and just used the smart TV as a monitor (and as a tuner if they watch OTA television). The problem there is the terrible UI of those A/V receivers, designed by committee that upholds long-standing traditions. It takes a l…

The Harmony remotes used to solve this problem - I am dreading the day my old Harmony One dies.

Oh man - I used to have a Harmony remote and thought it was the best thing ever for my multi-vendor AV setup...

...then the AppleTV was released, with a remote that made the Harmony look like the console of a nuclear power plant by comparison, and I never went back

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How do you use it without needing a TV or display to navigate the UI?

you are being unnecessarily disingenuous gp is most likely using a display that quickly boots into "source" mode – think hdmi input

I don't like Apple and its 'stuffs' but if it works anything like Spotify, then I can control 'it/Spotify' from my PC/Firefox while the music is played by my phone to an bluetooth JBL. So even without a dedicated TV/screen, I can listen to Spotify in other devices. I assume the comment would benefit from a setup like that - smartphone to control, AppleTV and the rest for the audio.

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Funny you should say that about toasters... Because I've been down a toaster buying rabbit hole over the past year and toasters are not all the same. I mean sure, a €20 toaster is gonna be the same as all other €20 toasters. But beyond that they have massively different build quality and toasting speed, and don't get me started on how hard it is to find a toaster designed for real bread instead of square supermarket…

commercial toasters, tvs, washing machines, you generally can't go wrong with spending a premium for something that was built to last a LOT of use. Speedqueen makes commercial washing machines with a consumer lineup that's serious about lasting a while. Easily set me back $1600, but then looking at the build quality and 10 year warranty I was like "ok, they probably mean it". One thing I noticed about commercial buil…

I came to the same conclusion. My usual research routine nowadays starts at "what product is used by (semi-)professionals".

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I feel like this is tied to the overall decline in movie and music quality. Maybe I'm just getting old. There is no more "Titanic" or "Nirvana". Lots of people have noticed the decline in audio mixing in movies as well, which has led to a generation of younger adults who need captions for regular movies. A discrete audio system would probably help with this but for what? How many times are you going to watch latest A…

> There is no more "Nirvana" That cacophony was considered quality music?

Subjectivity aside, I'm pretty sure Nirvana's target audience was teenagers using cheap headphones or their car stereos, not boomers with expensive HiFi setups, so that really is a funny remark.

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#198
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe it's always been this way and I just never noticed but at some point in the last ten years or so Samsung became synonymous with bottom of the barrel quality, while still charging premium prices. I won't buy anything with a samsung sticker on it, even used, because it's inevitably going to have failing electronics, stupid design decisions, too many half-baked features, and horrible buggy software/firmware. Your…

Same boat. I made the unfortunate mistake of buying Samsung kitchen stuff. The fridge ice maker had to have been designed by a troll. One piece of ice every 10 seconds or so. It took a minute to fill a simple dinner glass! Then the microwave handle just...fell off the door. In all my years of owning bottom of the barrel to top end brands, I didn't even realize it was possible. The repairman said it was common, but be…

My current phone is a cheap Samsung. It's awful. The usb-C connector has never worked for data and only barely works for power (the plug sits at a funny angle and doesn't charge unless it's "just right"). There doesn't seem to be any debris in the connector and I've tried a couple different cables, so my best guess is just the connector came from the factory misshapen.

Phone reception is terrible where I live, but I'm not sure if that's the fault of my phone or the carrier.

Re: Samsung is paying $350M for audio brands B&W, Denon, Marantz and Polk

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AppleTV running Apple Music connected to my Marantz AVR. No ads. No privacy concerns. I get lossless stereo where available and Atmos on selected tracks. It's great.

How do you use it without needing a TV or display to navigate the UI?

Not the parent but my home theater receiver is AirPlay compatible so I just select tracks using my phone as if it were a HomePod or Bluetooth speaker. We also have a VSSL for other rooms in the house. Same deal.
Post reply on HN