Live data from Hacker News

The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

den.dev

191–200 of 211 posts

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Original pi zero with usb Ethernet also runs fine

1. You’re totally right about that, but I couldn’t find one as easily 2. I was initally hesitant about using WiFi for DNS, but after reading comments it seemed that no one really had any issues. Mine has been kicking for 6 months sitting right next to my router without any noticeable delays, so I think it’s okay.

> I was initally hesitant about using WiFi for DNS, but after reading comments it seemed that no one really had any issues

FWIW, that was also an initial concern of mine. Almost three years later, i've never once had an issue with running my pi-hole over wifi.

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#192
post #44
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> read TFA for the iptables config that fixes those apps and devices that bypass local DNS. For example, Don't worry. All the browsers and stuff are bypassing this level of control by moving to DNS-over-HTTPS. You'll either have to deploy a TLS terminating proxy on your network, or give up on this arms race.

Would certificate pinning also remove the first option? I wonder if we are moving to a system where inspecting your own traffic isn't a viable option anymore, am I missing a workaround?

If you control the machine you can always defeat pinning, given enough effort. But for an IoT device, yeah, we're already there.

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Original pi zero with usb Ethernet also runs fine

1. You’re totally right about that, but I couldn’t find one as easily 2. I was initally hesitant about using WiFi for DNS, but after reading comments it seemed that no one really had any issues. Mine has been kicking for 6 months sitting right next to my router without any noticeable delays, so I think it’s okay.

it's mostly fine, only edge cases. with original zero W and 2.4ghz radio, microwaves were real interference.

I mostly used USB as an experiment and I didn't know what else to do with the regular-zero

Very cool how a $5 board could work so well! I was glad to see your post.

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#194
post #191

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. You’re totally right about that, but I couldn’t find one as easily 2. I was initally hesitant about using WiFi for DNS, but after reading comments it seemed that no one really had any issues. Mine has been kicking for 6 months sitting right next to my router without any noticeable delays, so I think it’s okay.

> I was initally hesitant about using WiFi for DNS, but after reading comments it seemed that no one really had any issues FWIW, that was also an initial concern of mine. Almost three years later, i've never once had an issue with running my pi-hole over wifi.

You're right it's usable, though DNS is the most critical service to have low latency.

on good wifi with no interference you can get good 2ms avg and 0.2-0.4 ms SD ping distribution.

ethernet will have 0.2 ms avg and 0.01 SD

it's the outliers that will cause headaches, when there is radio interference.

wifi is a dynamic system with every base station migrating bands for interference.

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You don't connect your phone to the internet?

Smartphone doesn't inherently mean telemetry and ads. https://grapheneos.org/ https://f-droid.org/

Well I can't control other peoples' devices and I do have friends over occasionally lol

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#196

My router just ate itself after the breaker on the house got cycled a few times in rapid succession. The router is almost a decade old, so perhaps it's not surprising. As a consequence, my pihole is temporarily out of commission. When we first set it up, we had IOT, android, chromebook, etc. Currently the whole household is on Linux and we just have a couple of smartphones. (plus a steamdeck) My wife has a few ugly a…

I know I'm not alone in maintaining a strong feeling that we've "gone the wrong way" with tech in a lot of ways, as the meme goes, and forgotten (societally) that tech is there for us rather than the other way around. I like your approach - take a light touch using technology; use tech where it helps and ignore it where it doesn't.

(The challenge of course is when you can't or aren't allowed to ignore it, its own challenge).

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#198

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Leave the computer running all the time. Never install software updates. Browsing for videos with keyboard is equivalent or better than browsing with phone. If you really want to browse with phone I guess you need a Firefox extension that can send the tab to the laptop. Personally I've never looked into that because I can't imagine wanting to do it.

> Browsing for videos with keyboard is equivalent or better than browsing with phone. Again, for you yes. But some lay down on the couch and a keyboard in that posture is just annoying. And copying a youtube video from the app, into firefox app to just send it to the computer is bonkers complicated when you could just press the cast icon. A lot of people interact with their phone all the time, but rarely use the comp…

Ah, using the YouTube app is a blunder! If you use the web version in Firefox you get to block ads.

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Do you honestly not understand why some people don't want that setup?

No, the objections are stupid. Not only is the Firefox experience vastly superior to any smart TV app, but you can have easy and effective ad blocking on top. My best guess at why people don't want to do this is that we're conditioned not to do anything that isn't advertised to us, and nobody is running adverts telling you to hook a laptop up to your TV for a superior smart TV experience.

[flagged]

Re: The Beauty of Having a Pi-Hole (2024)

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I followed this blog to get the firewall dynamic firewall in place: https://labzilla.io/blog/force-dns-pihole Like you said, you cannot just block 443, the dynamic firewall uses a public list, which contains all the public DNS known to man ( the last bit was just to sound a little dramatic haha ) So OPNSense will block anything within that list in both 443 and 853. So my Samsung QLED TV can no longer use Google:443 f…

Good stuff. As an alternative, has someone tried running http/s proxy on the firewall and blocking the rest of client HTTPS (except maybe for whitelist devices)?

Not all devices support proxies and it means you are blocking all UDP traffic (RTP, QUIC…) traffic, this will definitely not make your internet experience better…
Post reply on HN