Live data from Hacker News

DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

krebsonsecurity.com

191–200 of 586 posts

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#191
post #105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We live in a nation of laws You stopped living in a nation of laws a while ago. Now you live in a nation of might makes right.

We'll see. The thing about the law in the US, it's slow and heavy. You'll need to be pretty mighty to move it if it catches up to you.

Supreme court gave Trump a pass on all his crimes. We have already seen. No more waiting is necessary to find out.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#192
post #8

> According to a whistleblower complaint filed last week by Daniel J. Berulis, a 38-year-old security architect at the NLRB, officials from DOGE met with NLRB leaders on March 3 and demanded the creation of several all-powerful “tenant admin” accounts that were to be exempted from network logging activity that would otherwise keep a detailed record of all actions taken by those accounts. Feels like a pretty good Occa…

Setting aside legitimate (thats a matter of judgement)...

Some previous attempts for DOGE to get data has resulted in data being deleted before they can look and requests for judges to block access to data.

DOGE may be trying to be covert in order to stop these two activities from happening before they can get and review the data.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#193
post #187
post #174

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Without making any statement on whether I believe DOGE is being seditious, it's not hard to interpret their underlying intent as being wholly compatible with the definition you pasted. DOGE intends to hurt the government in ways that cause people to trust it less, with the goal of eliminating large parts of the government.

[flagged]

Yes, a part of the government can try to hurt the government, that is true.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#194
post #149
post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A twisted justification for suggesting someone who broke serious laws not face consequences. We live in a nation of laws, whether or not conspiracy-minded individuals prefer to follow them.

That law now officially includes an individual who is immune from the law and who can issue pardons to anyone for anything. So you live in a nation with optional laws.

Federal laws only. There is some daylight there.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> DOGE is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths through cuts to health programs That seems like a lot. Source?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/count-dead-millions-133000054.htm...

[flagged]

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#196

Untraceable and complete access to government databases. I can't begin to imagine the implications here.

We only hear about the cases where a someone is taking the risk of blowing the whistle, and actually manages to get the story out. Hopefully with enough substance for people to take the information seriously. How many cases that are likely to reach public knowledge is left as an exercise to the reader, as the saying goes.

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> DOGE is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths through cuts to health programs That seems like a lot. Source?

https://www.bu.edu/sph/news/articles/2025/tracking-anticipat... https://www.impactcounter.com/dashboard?view=table&sort=inte... https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-025-01191-z https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/usaid-funding-sav... This is just USAID. It's not even considering the cuts to HHS or other agencies.

[flagged]

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#198

The CEO of Tesla and Space-X; a self-proclaimed high IQ individual, an alleged programmer, has apparently hired a straight-up script kiddie to their elite delta force of technical government downsizers.

I agree with the script kiddies comment- which is basically what the reporting has shown... but in a way isn't that part of the point? That they can save billions of dollars just by having a couple of relatively normal comp sci kids (who can't even rent a car) review the most basic financial information of our government departments. These guys aren't supposed to be "delta force" they are supposed to be the interns.

Not trying to defend the means to the end, but I would really like my tax money used more efficiently. I will also say am extremely worried about the levels of access that they are being given, especially since it comes with basically no accountability

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

They're stopping congressionally mandated (i.e. legislation) payments to services, violating the Impoundment Control Act of 1974.

That doesn't sound like it would hold up in court. Which services?

Re: DOGE worker’s code supports NLRB whistleblower

#200
post #84
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Root on Linux isn’t exempt from logging. I also don’t know any enterprise that allows admin accounts to bypass logging. There is no legitimate justification for this request.

root on Linux can just kill the log forwarder and erase the relevant logs, or refill them with junk.

At least at places I've worked, terminating the logger would cause a security incident, and the central logging service have some general heuristics that should trigger a review if a log is filled with junk. Of course with enough time and root, there's ways to avoid that. But that's also usually why those with root are limited to a small subset of users, and assuming root usually requires a reason and is time gated.
Post reply on HN