Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

oncontracts.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

191–200 of 210 posts

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#191

Post by paradox460 »

chipotle_coyote wrote: post #170
chrisdhoover wrote: post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you travel back im time you’ll find audio connectors corroded. It was standard practice to use an eraser to polish the jacks. Monster offered gold plated connectors. It really made difference. Any benefits beyond non corrosive is questionable.

Back in the day, Radio Shack offered gold plated connectors on their cables, too (IIRC, there was "Archer" and "Archer Gold"). To this day I always get a little prickly at people who sneer at audiophile cables and specifically rag on gold-plated connectors rather than, I don't know, oxygen-free silver cables or whatever. The gold plating was actually a real valuable thing, and the cables could still actually be prett…

I still have a radio shack 3.5mm cable with gold connectors that my dad and I bought when I was 5. Still works great. One of my favorite cables. Has a lovely soft touch rubber insulation, which has survived all these years

My town has a radio shack still, and I visit them as much as I can, but I have yet to find a cable that nice

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#193

Post by Our_Benefactors »

nnf wrote: post #187
kulahan wrote: post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back before monoprice was bought by a Chinese company, I had one of their HDMI cables, and yeah - the connector just slipped right off. Buncha thin gold wires sticking out. I contacted them. They asked for a photo, which I was able to text them directly from my phone (very advanced for 2009). He looked at it, said it was their fault, and to toss it. Another was shipped to me. I have a Logitech mouse that’s double cli…

I have this problem with my Logitech mice too. They work great for two or three years, and then they start registering about one in every 50 clicks or so as double clicks, with the frequency slowly increasing to maybe 1 in 10.

That and the infinite-scroll wheel bearing fails. I’ve probably gone through 5-10 g502 mice in the past decade. I usually buy them 2-3 at a time when they are on sale.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#195

Post by BeFlatXIII »

Slow_Hand wrote: post #50
coin wrote: post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The reviews on the cables in question (Blue Jeans Cable) are wild. https://www.amazon.com/gp/customer-reviews/RYLMXICLLSJWC?ASI... "Music was much more open with plenty of air around the instruments. Imaging was superb - greatly improved over previous cables that I used. The depth was substantially improved with great instrumental recognition from front to rear. In other words, the speakers managed to disappear and o…

Welcome to the world of audiophiles. This kind of hyperbole for the magical powers bestowed by even the smallest (or most dubious) accessories is a source of unending amusement for me, if it wasn't so foolish.

Do you mean to imply that my quantum rocks (also useful for reiki) are pseudoscience?

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#196

Post by egberts1 »

remcob wrote: post #157
chrisdhoover wrote: post #156

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you travel back im time you’ll find audio connectors corroded. It was standard practice to use an eraser to polish the jacks. Monster offered gold plated connectors. It really made difference. Any benefits beyond non corrosive is questionable.

And now they sell gold-plated optical connectors.

And it so totally rugged against tarnished contacts, unlike copper or brass contact.

Would recommend.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#197

Post by neycoda »

nnf wrote: post #187
kulahan wrote: post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Back before monoprice was bought by a Chinese company, I had one of their HDMI cables, and yeah - the connector just slipped right off. Buncha thin gold wires sticking out. I contacted them. They asked for a photo, which I was able to text them directly from my phone (very advanced for 2009). He looked at it, said it was their fault, and to toss it. Another was shipped to me. I have a Logitech mouse that’s double cli…

I have this problem with my Logitech mice too. They work great for two or three years, and then they start registering about one in every 50 clicks or so as double clicks, with the frequency slowly increasing to maybe 1 in 10.

That might just be dust gathering or humidity/temperature weathering. I've fixed most degraded mice by cleaning them, and there's different sprays/lubes you can get that will not only help the hardware but the electrical responsiveness and accuracy.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#198

Post by metalman »

Frederation wrote: post #140
metalman wrote: post #104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Guitar cable?, ya...noooo cordless my droogys prolly cheaper too did a custom stealth mod to one guitar where the transmitter, plugs into 1/4 jack,under the back cover nice thing is that its possible to turn an amp up to face peeling loudness, and step back, and not get hurt, got to watch for things vibrating off of shelves though and are you kidding me?, I know that as a guitarer there are cumulative cognitive effec…

Some dressing to go with that salad, man?

shredding some words, but maybe I should join the chorus and try a little echo ;) mang

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#199

Post by Etherlord87 »

Pikamander2 wrote: post #147
Nifty3929 wrote: post #139

It's not that they picked the wrong guy to threaten - it's just that this particular one won't work out for Monster. No worries, on to the next. If 1 guy out of 100 fights back, and then you just leave that one alone, you're still a big winner.

Yeah, the title made me assume that he won a countersuit or got the company fined or something. In reality, he just sent them a slightly-snarky response to their flimsy cease-and-desist, and they decided not to go forward with a lawsuit, which is probably how it would have played out anyway.

I just shared this story with friends, and one of them, a musician, says he will now never again buy monster cables even though they are thought of the best quality. So there is a negative outcome of this to the company.

Re: Monster Cables picked the wrong guy to threaten (2008)

#200

Post by stego-tech »

olelele wrote: post #177
stego-tech wrote: post #6

It was this story that clued me into BJC as an entity in the first place. Gladly shelled out a couple hundred bucks for solidly-built custom speaker interconnects a few years later with them, and have zero regrets. As far as legal tactics go, I’m very sympathetic to his position and wish more folks would fight to the finish instead of settling for nuisance values.

After working with audio professionally I've developed a strong antipathy towards a lot of the audiophile industry. BJC has good prices and seem very legit in my eyes. The pricing seems to reflect actual production costs and not mumbo jumbo alignment in the copper fields...

That’s my take as well. They used high quality cables from Belden when I bought mine, not some cheap Chinese knockoff. They’re also not focused on nonsense like “ethernet regenerators” for audio signals or “HDMI cleaners” for video.

They’re just good, simple, solidly built cables that fulfill their intended functions. No snake oil, no BS. 10/10 will buy again when I’ve got a home and a rack for a bunch of fixed-length custom cabling.

Post reply on HN