191–200 of 445 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Anyone selling anything would want to remain crawlable if people use this to research something that could lead to a purchase.
Not necessarily. Southwest airlines doesnt allow itself on price comparison sites or Google Flights. Amazon listings are blocked from google shopping and other price comparison sites.
Gemini has had this for a month or two, also named "Deep Research" https://blog.google/products/gemini/google-gemini-deep-resea... Meta question: what's with all of the naming overlap in the AI world? Triton (Nvidia, OpenAI) and Gro{k,q} (X.ai, groq, OpenAI) all come to mind
Not sure if I'm too tired and can't see it but the lack of images/examples of the resulting report in this announcement doesn't inspire a lot of confidence just yet.
This smells like when Google released Gemini to have a product in the space.
> when Google released Gemini to have a product in the space.
Bard preceded Gemini.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a direction in a vast landscape, not a feature of itself - being better at different tasks, like search generally, and research in conjunction with reasoning, gets the model closer to AGI. An AGI will be able to do these tasks - so the point of the research is to have more Venn diagrams of capabilities like these to help narrow down the view on things that might actually be fundamental mechanisms involved in AGI…
> hings like feeling pain and pleasure can machine feel? without that there is no AGI according to definition above. and the second question: are animals "GI"? they don't have language and don't solve math problems, never heard of np-complete.
Feelings are nothing very special you know...
Yes, they can do some cool tricks, and tool calling is fun. No one should trust the output of these models, though. The hallucinations are bad, and my experience with the "reasoning" models is that as soon as they fuck up (they always do) they go off the rails worse than the base LLMs.
If I understood the graphs correctly, it only achieves 20% pass rate on their internal tests. So I have to wait 30min and pay a lot of money just to sift through walls of most likely incorrect text? Unless the possibility of hallucinations is negligible, this is just way too much content to review at once. The process probably needs to be a lot more iterative.