Live data from Hacker News

A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

core77.com

191–200 of 217 posts

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#191
Words from the second image:

マッサージボール massage balls

回転いす kaiten isu rotating seat

排水 haisui drainage/wastewater

石けんすい sekkensui soapy water

超音波 chōonpa ultrasound/ultrasonic waves

温風 onpū hot air

湯 yu hot water

I have acquired blurry kanji reading superpowers.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#192
I have a severely handicapped adult son and would very much like one of these. I ended up having one of those sit-down tubs for senior citizens installed for a mere $17,000 but this would be better. Have to admit I don’t love handwashing him.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#193
post #88

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You are right that for able bodied people it's at best a gimmick. But it might be useful for people with limited mobility, who don't want to depend on other people washing them.

Safely getting into and out of it looks very challenging for people with limited mobility. But the article's final photo is of completely different model - far more accessible, far safer, and for "the health care sector".

It's probably only that tall so onlookers can gawk at the pretty women's bodies inside through the transparent sides. If it were sitting on the ground, you wouldn't get such a great view.

A normal model would just sit on the floor.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#194
post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Your vision lacks the ultimate destination: This will replace the bed.

That sounds like that one guy a few years ago who wanted to replace all kitchen cupboards with dishwashers. Gonna steer clear of those directions. All things in moderation, etc.

Yngwie Malmsteen's kitchen cupboards are probably all Marshall speakers.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#195
post #176

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think this works. You can buy two small dishwashers, keep clean stuff in one, dirty in the other, then run the dirty one and swap. Or you can also just have one plate and wash it by hand after every meal.

Need to triple buffer or there’s a condition where you have used a plate from the clean pile, but the dirty wash is still running. You’d just have to stand there in the kitchen like some kind of Sims character.

There is still the sink.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#197
post #33
post #22

Before I clicked through, I was hoping this was going to be about right-to-repair washing machines for clothing.

Instead, it’s a quirky look at the technological optimism of the '70s

Yep, a time when things were getting generally better, not worse.

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#198
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What kind of crazy big baths are you taking?

If you google "average bath size" you find 30-70 gallons. 50 is right in the middle.

I suspect those numbers are for filling the tub to the brim? Is that normal?

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A nominal water aerator limits water around 5L-6L/min levels. For every minute I don't use the water, I spend approximately two full kettles of water. With every 5L of water I can - Cook 4 servings (~400 grams) of pasta. - Brew 5L of tea/coffee - Water all the plants at home two times. - Possibly wash most of my handwash-only dishes in one go. - etc. So it's not not meaningfully wasteful . However, I can't turn off t…

Water is by far the most abundant resource on the planet (70+% of earth is water), and we have methods to remove salt and contaminants from almost all of it. We can even turn urine into drinking water. I wouldn’t worry about wasting it. We’ll die from something else long before water becomes an issue.

70% of the surface of the Earth is covered by water. That turns out to mean little. Have you seen this?

https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/all-earths-water-a-single-...

Re: A washing machine for human beings, from 1970

#200
post #184

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, but getting rid of chemicals and returning it to a non-poisonous state for the nature is a big plus. You can't dump everything to the soil and say "that's your problem now, nature. Cope!".

Assuming you use the same amount of soap and what nots, and get the same amount of dirt and debris off your body, the more water you use during a shower, the easier it is to process the water at your sewage treatment plant, if your waste water is treated. If your waste water isn't treated, and is discharged to water ways as-is, the more water you use, the more dilute your pollution. If you've got a septic system, I d…

> [...] the easier it is to process the water at your sewage treatment plant, if your waste water is treated.

It's easier to process per litre, but it is easier to process in absolute numbers?

Post reply on HN