Live data from Hacker News

Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

joelgustafson.com

191–200 of 252 posts

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#191

I'm part of the wave of users who migrated to bluesky last week. I have to say I really like it so far, which surprised me a bit given that I had been underwhelmed by mastodon before. I already spend more time in bluesky than in twitter. For those (like me) who don't know what bluesky is, it's basically a carbon copy of twitter circa 2015, down to an almost identical UI. Except that there's no monetization, no ads, n…

[deleted]

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#192
post #163

I'm part of the wave of users who migrated to bluesky last week. I have to say I really like it so far, which surprised me a bit given that I had been underwhelmed by mastodon before. I already spend more time in bluesky than in twitter. For those (like me) who don't know what bluesky is, it's basically a carbon copy of twitter circa 2015, down to an almost identical UI. Except that there's no monetization, no ads, n…

Given that Bluesky is VC funded, I imagine it'll just be a matter of time until the monetization, ads, and growth hacking start. Enjoy it while you can, I suppose.

Or avoid it if you value your time and effort: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42119658

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#193
post #173
post #114

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have a problem with too many furry posts I have bad news for you about Bluesky

I used to see a lot of furry accounts in the Discover feed, but I mute them when I see them, and now I rarely see them any more. I don't have anything against furries, but it's not content I'm interested in. This is more a comment that Bluesky does seem to have an algorithm (at least in the Discover feed) that is sensitive to what you do or don't show interest in. Or it could just be that a lot more people have joine…

Discover has a separate "show more/less like this" button too.

Every feed on the site is its own algorithm, and most are made by third-parties. Some of the more interesting ones have fallen over and broken a little as the volume of posts has increased. The various "catch up" feeds that show the most popular recent posts give a good impression of what's happening site wide (minus any blocks/mutes).

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#194

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If Bluesky is decentralized, can't twitter still train on Bluesky posts?

There’s arguably a moral difference between having your stuff stolen, and giving it up as part of the TOS. Most artists, you’d assume, would prefer the former.

Bluesky's TOS[1]:

> You grant us permission to: Use User Content to develop, provide, and improve Bluesky Social, the AT Protocol, and any of our future offerings

[1]: https://bsky.social/about/support/tos#user-content

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

While I don't think it's technically hate speech, but yeah bluesky is either just unanimous negativity or positivity for different things, and it feels like groupthink. There is no middle ground.

Almost all social networks have been ideologically polarized since 2016. It's not new or specific to Bluesky. The only reason Hacker News avoided that fate is due to downvote/flag mechanisms.

> The only reason Hacker News avoided that fate

It hasn't avoided that fate. If you doubt me, go into a thread about US politics and praise Donald Trump and watch as your comments get not just downvoted, but flagged so that they are hidden. This will happen no matter how good your arguments are.

Make no mistake, this site is ideologically polarized just like all the others. The only saving grace is that the vast majority of topics are about tech, not politics, so the polarization is usually hidden.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#196

Fortunately using Bridgy Fed we can connect BlueSky with Fediverse and IndieWeb. https://github.com/snarfed/bridgy-fed/

can I get a ELI10 on this - If I host a mastodon server, would I need to run this software along side it then and then everyone on my server could see these other platforms posts and such?

Accounts on any supported platform can follow the bot on their platform, and their posts get bridged to all the other ones as a subdomain of the bridgy bot. e.g. a mastodon instance with a handle for every bridged account.

It changed to require opting in to bridging because many mastodon users got very mad about it.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#197

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have no interest in being in a left-leaning bubble. I get both sides on X, so far. People think X has been leaning more and more to the right, but in truth it's just not being censored (sorry, moderated) anymore, leading to more right-leaning content. Leftists can't really tolerate any difference of opinion so they move to other platforms, it's sad. But I think they'll be bored and eventually come back for some mor…

What specific type of content was being censored before Elon took over that is being allowed now?

I seem to recall at some point that that old Twitter banned the account of the sitting President of the United States.

Later, Twitter banned a comedy account, the Babylon Bee. That pissed Elon off enough to buy it.

Both are back on Twitter now, both the comedy account, and the politician who will be President for a second term in January, having won both the Electoral College and the popular vote.

That's just two examples, but I would call them salient ones.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#198

The best thing about Bluesky is you can use your domain as your username. I'm @bradgessler.com on there, so if people want to "verify" me, they see something more meaningful than a blue checkbox, which is my website. If I ever get blocked, banned, deplatformed, whatever—people would see my domain and be able to go there to determine what's going on. In a sense it's "censorship-evident". I think this will be great for…

The default handles (ending in .bsky.social) you get from signing up also redirect to your profile on bsky.app by default. Even if someone has no idea what bluesky is, they can load up that URL (even with the @) and be looking at your social profile right away.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#199

Bluesky and atproto seem to be built to be hackable. Someone in the community recently built a searchable directory of Bluesky "Starter Packs" (which are a way for a user to publish a set of interesting people & feeds to follow, primarily to help newcomers bootstrap their experience): https://blueskydirectory.com/starter-packs/all Dan Abramov posted about it earlier today, saying he liked it and: "the fact that it ca…

I was contemplating coming over, but this comment is the most convincing to me.

I think one of the fatal flaws tech companies have been making is locking things in. But what made the computer so great, what made the smartphone so great, was to make them hackable. You build environments, you build ecosystems. Lockin only slows you down. I mean how long would it have taken for smartphones to have a flashlight if it weren’t for apps? A stopwatch? These were apps before they were built into the operating systems.

Re: Visualizing 13M Bluesky users

#200
post #72

Bluesky and atproto seem to be built to be hackable. Someone in the community recently built a searchable directory of Bluesky "Starter Packs" (which are a way for a user to publish a set of interesting people & feeds to follow, primarily to help newcomers bootstrap their experience): https://blueskydirectory.com/starter-packs/all Dan Abramov posted about it earlier today, saying he liked it and: "the fact that it ca…

Starterpacks are great, what about seeing what is current top engaging accounts ? https://www.graphtracks.com

That's the best looking Bsky tool that I've seen so far. Nice!
Post reply on HN