Earlier quoted context omitted.
That you've "lived in sweden" implies you have the luxury of hopping to whatever country suits you most. Nobody wants to hear a cosmopolitan's take on how we have too much privacy and how the government should be more involved in our lives. If the government mistreats you, you can just go to a nicer country.
Around 500 million people living in the EU have that privilege. It’s pretty common for people to exercise it and in no way makes you part of the jet set.
Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
191–200 of 288 posts
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#192Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not a secret if your company uses any of the large payroll services due the Equifax "The Work Number".
Don't you need to specifically authorize someone to use that to get your salary?
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#193It’s amazing that 54% of adults in the United States have a literacy below 6th grade level, but it is expected for the same population to have the financial literacy to file their taxes accurately. Going further, the IRS already knows the details of most people’s taxes before they file, yet everyone is expected to complete what amounts to a complex task for many people. I cannot fathom why it is still done this way.
I guess it was originally done this way because in the past people actually had some semblance of privacy and the government didn't actually know a great deal about people's income. Eventually, privacy was eroded away year after year to the point where the government now knows an extreme amount about each citizen. I guess I'd refrain the question - instead of asking why do we need to do taxes when the government know…
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#194did you ever try to use any USA federal service? (veteran benefits, free tax filing, ssn, etc). you're required an id.me account.
what's that? well some anonymous group saw login.gov, realized the value of the data, and lobbied that it should be open to free capital markets to explore, not the government!
so now if you want to even talk to the irs or veteran service, you need to go to that privately owned id.me site, do a video call, scan all the documents they ask for (even ones without visible anti counterfeit mechanics like your typewritter filled ssn card).
and the best part? right after you create your account, you land on a coupon clipping page that is a facsimile of the garbage pamphlet the usps is forced to shove daily in yout physical mailbox! and among the links on that page are links to Whitepapers about how advertisers can benefit from buying user data from them because it includes gov affiliation like vetetan, taxpayer, etc and bank information!
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#195Earlier quoted context omitted.
I hope you realize that these federal agencies are funded through revenue collection - i.e tax code. Unfortunately, Your simplification isn't really a simplification.
Yes, the purpose of the IRS is revenue collection via federal income tax for funding the government with. Said funding can then be given to the agencies and organizations I mentioned in my previous comment. Simplified tax code means less tax money is spent on administration overhead of the IRS itself and more money that can go to programs like WIC, SNAP, TANF, and other targeted programs that are more effective aid t…
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#196Earlier quoted context omitted.
It depends on if your yearly payments to them exceed some threshold. There may be more to it than that, of course. Don’t listen to me, I’m the idiot who couldn’t figure it out.
Per care.com[1], the threshold is $2700 per year: For all intents and purposes, a babysitter is looked at just like a nanny in that if they must adhere to the schedule you set and come to your home to take care of your kids based on the rules you set, the IRS will most likely view this as an employment relationship. And taxes can sneak up on you quickly. If the babysitter earns just $15 per hour and works even 10 hou…
And at some point you just pay cash.
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#197let me copy a comment i had in another article: did you ever try to use any USA federal service? (veteran benefits, free tax filing, ssn, etc). you're required an id.me account. what's that? well some anonymous group saw login.gov, realized the value of the data, and lobbied that it should be open to free capital markets to explore, not the government! so now if you want to even talk to the irs or veteran service, yo…
i bet Stalin also had good approval after the purge
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#198Earlier quoted context omitted.
They're probably right about that?
i'm not saying that they're wrong. i'm just saying that's a lot of the logic. it is pretty cynical to say "i don't want to make people's lives easier so they better align with my political goals"
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#199Earlier quoted context omitted.
There never was a point in the period of time when people filed taxes in the US that the government wasn’t entitled to know your salary. It used to take more time and effort to get the info, but better technology doesn’t change the game, it highlights that it wasn’t a « shared secret ». Your employer has a ton of paperwork to file related to your pay.
Did you not just explain how the game changed from technology in your own post? Before all of this unconstitutional collection of Americans information the government had to have a target and go out and collect and tabulate the information. Now it’s a select where citizen does thing x over y threshold. How is this not changing the game?
Re: Claiming high user satisfaction, IRS will decide on renewing free tax site
#200Earlier quoted context omitted.
Just a minor comment, but: why does EITC exist? Just a hidden welfare payment? That out if the way, I agree with the earlier comment: why does the government automatically know all your financial details? Where is the privacy? Where is the requirement for a warrant, to access your private information?
Hilarious that the government makes some of us think that portion of someone's money returned to that person is a "welfare payment"