Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah, but it wouldn't have as far to go, since the maximum distance between any two stations is half as far on a ring city of circumference d as on a linear city of length d , and you can get even shorter if you cut across the ring. To get the same area, you'd have to have slightly more center-line circumference on a ring city as linear distance on a line, but even so your transit distances are going to be shorter on…
Right but if the idea is to maximize the open space / city size while maintaining a fast transit system, then the line makes sense to me. I guess I don’t really understand the criticism, most of which seems to be “you should just build something that isn’t the thing you want to build.” There is plenty of aesthetic merit to the linear city idea on its own. To use an example of a place that already exists: the city Łód…
Are we just making things up? Just by a single glance at a map of Łódź you can see that this is not true. The city is clearly blob shaped.
> I guess I don’t really understand the criticism, most of which seems to be “you should just build something that isn’t the thing you want to build.”
The criticism is that there are reasons why cities are built the way they are built. "Looks good on a 3d render" is not a great reason to do something, and the reasons the proponents list don't hold up to scrutiny.