Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT for Teams

openai.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

191–200 of 453 posts

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#191

Post by benreesman »

tomcam wrote: post #186
vincnetas wrote: post #99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Now you know how your girlfriend feels when she hears you speak with other software people :) Excuse my assumptions if they are incorrect. I'm making projections from my own point of view.

Romeo here flexing about how he has an actual girlfriend. Sorry, Casanova, we’re busy refining mobile-ready inference models and leetcoding while you go on your so-called “dates”

Reddit-inspired humor on HN done right, hat tip, almost impossible to do (and I've tried for 15 years with less success).

lulz.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#192

Post by azeirah »

EmilStenstrom wrote: post #169
benreesman wrote: post #66

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Here's a glossary to understand this post: - mixtral-8x7 or 8x7: Open source model by Mistral AI. - Dolphin: An uncensored version of the mistral model - 3.5-turbo: GPT-3.5 Turbo, the cheapest API from OpenAI - 4-series preview OR "4.5 preview": GPT-4 Turbo, the most capable API from OpenAI - mistral-medium: A new model by Mistral AI that they are only serving through AI. It's in private beta and there's a waiting li…

That's an impressive list of jargon whaha

Love how deep the rabbithole has gone in just a year. I am unfortunately in the camp of understanding the post without needing a glossary. I should go outside more :|

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#193

Post by rrr_oh_man »

EmilStenstrom wrote: post #169
benreesman wrote: post #66

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Here's a glossary to understand this post: - mixtral-8x7 or 8x7: Open source model by Mistral AI. - Dolphin: An uncensored version of the mistral model - 3.5-turbo: GPT-3.5 Turbo, the cheapest API from OpenAI - 4-series preview OR "4.5 preview": GPT-4 Turbo, the most capable API from OpenAI - mistral-medium: A new model by Mistral AI that they are only serving through AI. It's in private beta and there's a waiting li…

I love you, Emil

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#194

Post by midasuni »

cald0s wrote: post #157
shrx wrote: post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

But that's how headlines work

The page title is “ChatGPT for teams”

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#195

Post by rightbyte »

benreesman wrote: post #129
pyinstallwoes wrote: post #73

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Can you share some examples of how you are using it? Mixtral that is? What's your setup? What's your flow/workflow?

I screenshotted my emacs session upthread in a bit of a cheeky "AI-talking-about-AI" joke: https://imgur.com/WDrqxsz . While I heavily rely on `emacs` as my primary interface to all this stuff, I'm slowly-but-surely working on a curated and opinionated collection of bindings and tools and themes and shit for all the major hacker tools (VSCode, `nvim`, even to a degree the JetBrains ecosystem). This is all broadly par…

Feel free to push the code. Elisp should be hacky and embarrassing otherwise you are doing it wrong :)

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#196

Post by benreesman »

EmilStenstrom wrote: post #169
benreesman wrote: post #66

I’ve got my stuff rigged to hit mixtral-8x7, and dolphin locally, and 3.5-turbo, and the 4-series preview all with easy comparison in emacs and stuff, and in fairness the 4.5-preview is starting to show some edge on 8x7 that had been a toss-up even two weeks ago. I’m still on the mistral-medium waiting list. Until I realized Perplexity will give you a decent amount of Mistral Medium for free through their partnership…

Here's a glossary to understand this post: - mixtral-8x7 or 8x7: Open source model by Mistral AI. - Dolphin: An uncensored version of the mistral model - 3.5-turbo: GPT-3.5 Turbo, the cheapest API from OpenAI - 4-series preview OR "4.5 preview": GPT-4 Turbo, the most capable API from OpenAI - mistral-medium: A new model by Mistral AI that they are only serving through AI. It's in private beta and there's a waiting li…

I'm clearly spending far too much time tuning/training/using these things if a glossary to make my post comprehensible to HN is longer than my remark: thank you for correcting my error in dragging this sub-sub-sub-field into a thread of general interest.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#197

Post by lwhi »

shrx wrote: post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

I disagree.

We shouldn't assume a basic sentence capitalised word refers to a product.

If a reference to a product is intended, we should clarify that association some other way; i.e. MS Teams.

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#198

Post by tomcam »

benreesman wrote: post #191
tomcam wrote: post #186

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Romeo here flexing about how he has an actual girlfriend. Sorry, Casanova, we’re busy refining mobile-ready inference models and leetcoding while you go on your so-called “dates”

Reddit-inspired humor on HN done right, hat tip, almost impossible to do (and I've tried for 15 years with less success). lulz.

tbh I expected serious downvotage

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#199

Post by PeterStuer »

walteweiss wrote: post #79
Demiurge wrote: post #74

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have 20 years of software development experience, and I couldn’t understand anything you said. Is there a dictionary for this new lingo, or am I just too mid?

Oh thank you, I was reading and none of that made any sense to me. I thought it could be a presentation of some dumb AI output. Now I see I’m not alone.

"Dolphin, an emulator for Nintendo video games", but in this context it refers to "Dolphin, an open-source and uncensored, and commercially licensed dataset and series of instruct-tuned language models based on Microsoft's Orca paper." https://erichartford.com/dolphin

Re: ChatGPT for Teams

#200

Post by tgv »

lwhi wrote: post #197
shrx wrote: post #142

Could a moderator change the "Teams" in the title to lowercase (as it is in the article)? Capitalizing Teams misleadingly implies it's regarding Microsoft's chat platform.

I disagree. We shouldn't assume a basic sentence capitalised word refers to a product. If a reference to a product is intended, we should clarify that association some other way; i.e. MS Teams.

The reading process is automatic. It's quite likely that capitalized "Teams" is read by may as the product name. And it's reasonable, because in most daily contexts, "teams" refers to actual "teams" and "Teams" refers to the product. Nobody (including you) is going to teach them to stop doing that. Adapting a rather dumb capitalization rule is a lot easier.

I do agree that editors should read their topics critically and add disambiguating text (if possible and permitted).

Post reply on HN