Earlier quoted context omitted.
The models in question are explicitly aligned in order to prevent NSFW images, at great expense. So not making nudes absolutely is a stated feature of this software.
It’s security theatre and IEEE should, as a fundamentals organization, call that out rather than testing security measures and shallow reporting. The security theatre serves interests, talk about that.
Firstly, training on a corpus of medical terms (as opposed to 6th grade English) will produce just as many nonsense embeddings.
Secondly, the post-processing filters to prevent medical malpractice will be much bigger than intentional nudity. It’s malpractice to horizontally flip a medical image (think right foot is now left foot).
Talking about process of developing a nudity filter is the industry’s way of demonstrating feasibility for more-serious applications.