Live data from Hacker News

Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

viewfromthewing.com

191–200 of 372 posts

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#191
post #136

For those thinking about preventative solutions, there are some existing, all very expensive of course. The simplest is placing a row of red lights in the ground at all intersections to runways. When an airplane is cleared for takeoff and until it is airborne the controller presses a button and turns all these lights red. Pilots are instructed that regardless of clearance, a red light over-rides that, and to never cr…

I'm not disputing that it's very expensive but I find it funny that the "install red lights" solution is considered to be vey expensive.

People die at intersections with stop signs every day, but we don’t do it on our roads for the exact same reason.

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#192

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I was on a plane that had engine issues during takeoff, front wheel off the ground. We slammed back down to earth and likewise they braked harder than I'd ever experienced. Lady's phone flew out of her hand. It was intense.

Wow. That's almost unheard of. There's a speed called "V1"; this is the last possible moment for a pilot to start aborting the takeoff. There's another speed called "Vr", which is when the pilot starts the rotation (lifting the nose off the ground) [1]. Vr is higher than V1. Past V1 its unsafe to abort, even if a tire blows or an engine fails. The only time it would be aborted would be if the pilot thinks the plane i…

Ameristar Charters 9363 is one example of this happening:

> Captain Mark Radloff was thus faced with an almost unprecedented situation: having already accelerated well past V1, he suddenly realized that his airplane would not become airborne. At that point he faced a choice — keep trying to force it into the air and risk failing, running off the runway at well beyond takeoff speed, or try to stop, and guarantee a lower-speed overrun?

https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/lesser-of-two-evils-the-...

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#193
Murphy's Law in action. With this many flights per day, you need tons of safety measures to ensure that mistakes like this are extremely unlikely. Like "defense in depth", you can't rely on just a few layers of countermeasures, the more the better. So yes, red lights at every intersection are good, but retrofitting planes with a gps-style map that shows exactly where to go and when to turn is even better (and of course probably insanely expensive).

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#194

I flew into JFK in December and was surprised the number of concurrent operations going on… landing queues of 5+ planes in the sky for the two runways, long takeoff queues, so many land operations… once you touch down it sure feels like the pilot knows they have to get that plane off the runway ASAP. Felt much more busy than I have previously going through LAX/SFO/London/Dubai. I wonder if the level of traffic at JFK…

A colleague of mine was blocked in NY overnight on a flight from Rome in early Jan, as the incoming flight clipped the tail of another airplane right after landing.

https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/ita-airwa...

This stuff is happening a bit too often in JFK as of lately...

From the article: > The Italian airline, noting it fully respects all safety regulations, said in Thursday's statement that "collisions during taxiing manoeuvres are an increasing phenomenon ... especially in highly congested airports like JFK."

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#195
post #119

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hmm that's interesting since by the time the front wheel comes off the ground, an airplane would normally be past V1 speed and they'd have to commit to the takeoff.

That’s generally true but the rule is that you never abort past V1 unless you have specific immediate reason to believe the aircraft cannot become and stay airborne. There aren’t a ton of reasons one might think that but a few come to mind like total engine failure or lack of elevator control or similar.

> lack of elevator control

This was the case with Ameristar Charters 9363, which aborted after V1:

> [T]he jammed elevator could only be detected once aerodynamic forces came into play — something which would only happen once the plane was already speeding down the runway. The NTSB was forced to come to an incredible conclusion: that there was no way for the pilots to have detected the problem until they attempted to rotate for takeoff.

https://admiralcloudberg.medium.com/lesser-of-two-evils-the-...

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#196
post #136

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm not disputing that it's very expensive but I find it funny that the "install red lights" solution is considered to be vey expensive.

People die at intersections with stop signs every day, but we don’t do it on our roads for the exact same reason.

McKinsey style interview question. How many road intersections are there in the US?

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#197
post #13

> strong kudos are due both to the air traffic controller who called off the Delta 737 and to the pilots of that plane who managed to abort their takeoff and stop the aircraft before it crossed runway 31L where the Boeing widebody passed in front of it Can't agree more

[flagged]

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#198

I flew into JFK in December and was surprised the number of concurrent operations going on… landing queues of 5+ planes in the sky for the two runways, long takeoff queues, so many land operations… once you touch down it sure feels like the pilot knows they have to get that plane off the runway ASAP. Felt much more busy than I have previously going through LAX/SFO/London/Dubai. I wonder if the level of traffic at JFK…

The safety issues at JFK stem from the fact that it is a very old airport, built for the turboprop era.

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#199
post #91

For those thinking about preventative solutions, there are some existing, all very expensive of course. The simplest is placing a row of red lights in the ground at all intersections to runways. When an airplane is cleared for takeoff and until it is airborne the controller presses a button and turns all these lights red. Pilots are instructed that regardless of clearance, a red light over-rides that, and to never cr…

> For those thinking about preventative solutions, there are some existing, all very expensive of course. The simplest is placing a row of red lights in the ground at all intersections to runways. That's... a street light.[1] When street lights become "very expensive of course" it's time to revisit our priors about how we regulate. And I say this as someone not normally inclined to libertarian rhetoric. [1] To be cle…

The vast majority of road intersections do not have traffic lights. This is because they are expensive. People die every day at intersections without traffic lights. The money to put up the lights just doesn’t exist. A basic 4 way stop is about a quarter million to put in traffic lights. And even at that price you do not get lights with high availability features.

Re: Friday night’s near-disaster at JFK airport

#200
I had a sort-of hobby of learning and listening to ATC at one point. Some of these guys were scary-unintelligible . I remember this Chinese ATC at some major airport saying as fast as he possibly could “clah de leh” which was supposed to be “Clear to land”. It’s amazing the system works as well as it does.
Post reply on HN