Live data from Hacker News

Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

home.omg.lol

191–200 of 385 posts

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#193
post #178

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've been a happy omg.lol subscriber for years Interesting, how many years would you estimate it's been around? I see their Mastodon server is pretty new (since last July) and wayback doesn't have the homepage archived at all. Can't think of another way of checking.

The domain was registered in 2019 and work started later - as they say on their "About" page. So "subscriber for years" where years <= 2.

I can chime in here, service has been running for a little under 4 years. I have been subscribed for over 3.5 years.

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#194
post #45

If this was positioned as "20usd/year mastodon account on our cool instance and - BTW - you get free webpage and email forwarding" would get much closer to the audience. I sense the point of this funny domain is the community, and community is centered on mastodon instance which btw, is not cheap to run as soon as it grows beyond a few hundred people. (I'm including potential moderation costs)

If it was advertised as mastodon I would close the webpage. I have 0 interest in it and I don’t know anyone in my direct tech circle who is on it.

You really have no interest in the concept of a non-corporate / non–billionaire-controlled Twitter? Not trying to bait you, but genuinely curious on your stance.

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#195
post #167

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Domain registration has to be renewed, either per year or per years if you buy a bunch of licenses up front. So what's the alternative to this then? A lot of domains can cost around $20 per year.

Creating a subdomain once you have the domain is free, probably for the domain omg.lol they're paying $20 / year.

omg.lol was probably a premium domain of some kind. Random three-letter .lols seem to go for about $150/yr (according to gandi).

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#196
It's in fact a really nice service. I think addressing the portability issue with a bring-your own DNS might appease some people (and still bill $20, or even more). BUT, if I had a Product Owner hat on, this is not something I would prioritize as a one-man show.

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#198

I expected to hate this and walked away thinking it was a pretty ok idea. Good job! The idea of curating alternate services together and offering it as a product feels novel - does anyone else do this? I'd love to see hosting offered for curated open source services that are interoperable. Sort of like all those WordPress hosts of yore (and today!). Edit: omg.lol, is it AOL?? :D Edit 2: The price is even the same! $1…

> The idea of curating alternate services together and offering it as a product feels novel - does anyone else do this? It's a different but related concept: Framasoft in France ( https://framasoft.org/fr/ ). It's a non-profit that provides open-source alternatives to common cloud services. They also teach people how to install and configure these tools on their own server instead of relying on providers reselling th…

They also used to host quite a lot of stuff before they decided it went both beyond their means and contrary to their goals.

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#199

I expected to hate this and walked away thinking it was a pretty ok idea. Good job! The idea of curating alternate services together and offering it as a product feels novel - does anyone else do this? I'd love to see hosting offered for curated open source services that are interoperable. Sort of like all those WordPress hosts of yore (and today!). Edit: omg.lol, is it AOL?? :D Edit 2: The price is even the same! $1…

> The idea of curating alternate services together and offering it as a product feels novel - does anyone else do this?

There is also https://librem.one services.

Re: Omg.lol – A lovable web page and email address

#200

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it was advertised as mastodon I would close the webpage. I have 0 interest in it and I don’t know anyone in my direct tech circle who is on it.

You really have no interest in the concept of a non-corporate / non–billionaire-controlled Twitter? Not trying to bait you, but genuinely curious on your stance.

I believe the issue for many people is not the "non-corporate / non-billionaire-control" part, and more the "twitter" part. It may sound weird to people who use twitter, but much of the world don't have the slightest interest in the concept.
Post reply on HN