Live data from Hacker News

Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

help.twitter.com

191–200 of 790 posts

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#194
I never understood the "public square" argument that so many people made about the role of Twitter or other social media platforms. They're really just private courtyards where permission to pass is controlled by the owner of the courtyard, within the constraints set out in the legal system on discrimination (i.e. the same as for restaurants, movie theaters, etc.). Here's the underlying legal basis of protected free speech in the United States:

> "First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

However, that seems to raise an issue with the FBI - a government agency - directing a private entity to ban speech from persons they wish to silence, doesn't it?

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#195
post #117

Ah damn, I hoped for a fair experiment to demonstrate absordity of total free speech, but istead we got bog standard hypocracy! Boo! If you are caught wondering why some people still support Elon - in 'true conservative' society, like Russia or Saudi states, hypocracy is means of demonstrating hierarchy. So as a leader, you show that you are dominant by demonstrating that rules don't apply to you. That makes you even…

I genuinely believed that he would try to allow more free speech on Twitter. There was a small chance that the experiment will succeed. I guess he never wanted that: he just lied. But why?

It turns out he's just everything his critics has said he is, and that he is indeed just following his preexisting standard of behavior. That's just how it is sometimes.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#196

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe it doesn’t fit the generic laws against anticompetitive practices, mostly because they don’t have dominance in any market. Compare Apple’s iOS stores. There may be something in newer legislation which has made data portability a priority. And Apple has just changed its practice, but due only to very specific pressure. So I’d say this is rather pathetic, but not illegal.

> mostly because they don’t have dominance in any market. Keep in mind that at least the FTC generally considers a market to be, roughly, goods and services that are close substitutes for one another[1]. That is, if one good or service can be substituted for another, those may be in the same market. However, as the FTC's summary says, "evidence that customers highly value certain product attributes may limit their wi…

Twitter’s inclusion of Facebook points to the idea that they consider it a competitor, and would be one far larger.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

There are no real structural constraints to capitalism that I'm aware of.

Just the labor pool approaching zero. When it bounces along the bottom, capitalism hires children, etc.

Re: Promotion of alternative social platforms policy

#200
post #19

"Thin-skinned narcissist buys criticism machine." This is not "free speech absolutism" in the slightest. It's not even business-savvy. Elon's mask has truly cracked, and he proves he is nothing but a febrile mind who has bought into his own hype.

I tried really hard to stay an Elon fan. SpaceX is a step function game changer, and Starlink was such a cool related market to break into. Now I have to go change my Twitter profiles that have been the same for ages... Has Musk never heard of the Streisand effect? I've always been bearish on TSLA. Now I think the narrative is changing. The market monopoly bull case never made sense. Every car company and nation will…

> I've always been bearish on TSLA though. Every car company and nation will be pumping out EVs soon. The market monopoly bull case never made sense. I think the true value is half of Toyota's market cap, and I'll be buying puts on Monday.

IIRC Elon himself has said that Tesla is doomed without the success of FSD. I think any rational person would agree it's baffling how high a valuation Tesla has held for so long, especially when you compare them to any other car manufacturer, but as the saying goes "the market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent."

Post reply on HN