Live data from Hacker News

Privately-Owned Rail Cars

amtrak.com

191–200 of 250 posts

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#191
post #129
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes that's true. They try to put private cars at the front or rear of a train, but sometimes they aren't able to. So you may have the public walking through as you eat dinner. Comes with the territory {shrug}. Train crew (conductors) always have the right to walk through the car. If your train goes into Tampa Florida for example, the train has to reverse out of the station to a wye so it can turn around. If you are t…

So you have to worry about the actual sleeping room doors being locked, and cannot leave a laptop just lying out in the dining room?

If you’ve got a private rail car on an Amtrak train in the first place, I’m sure you can afford enough staff for a night watch shift if you really were concerned.

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#192
post #17

This is my "if I won the lottery" dream. Which it would have to be, since everything about it isn't cheap. Purchasing a Pullman car then upgrading it to Amtrak standards will cost at least $300k. Any interior upgrades are on top of that (renovating the galley with modern appliances, adding central air since some cars used block ice for cooling). Amtrak requires you add 480v head-end power (but you will likely want a…

I never wanted one to go anywhere, I've always wanted one for a tiny house / social space on my property. They always struck me as a perfect option for a unique cabin. I know there are old rail car hotels, but I've never seen one that epitomizes the pullman luxury.

A couple generations ago it was not uncommon for people in rural areas to buy old boxcars from the railroad for this purpose. My grandfather did it.

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#193
post #17

This is my "if I won the lottery" dream. Which it would have to be, since everything about it isn't cheap. Purchasing a Pullman car then upgrading it to Amtrak standards will cost at least $300k. Any interior upgrades are on top of that (renovating the galley with modern appliances, adding central air since some cars used block ice for cooling). Amtrak requires you add 480v head-end power (but you will likely want a…

Thanks for the really interesting writeup! > Personally I wonder why Amtrak doesn't offer a "Presidential" fare, where 6 or so people can book a private car and get truly top tier service. Could a 3rd-party company offer this? I.e., they own and operate the Presidential-like cars, and are a contractual middle-man between Amtrak and the riders?

Maybe like a timeshare. You can have this car reserved for November .

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#194
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, that's the "banned this practice" change that I was talking about. The documents in the link that the post is about are from 2021/2022 though. So they must have un-banned it. The "guidelines" document at https://www.amtrak.com/content/dam/projects/dotcom/english/p... lists 44 Amtrak stations throughout the US where this practice is allowed (and likely to continue to disrupt schedules for regular passengers). It…

I don't understand why Amtrak - the only operator on its own tracks - is unable to make it work, meanwhile in EU you have literally thousands of private operators operating their own trains as well as combined multi-owner trains riding on tracks belonging to dozens of owners... and it works fairly well, there certainly are no 6+ hours delays, at most an hour or so for the whole multi-state 1000km trip.

New York to LA is almost 5 times that length. So your "at most an hour or so" can feasibly snowball to 6+ hours.

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't follow, why would you want the rabble to pass through your private space?

Well for the exact same reason why it's so fun to drive a very expensive very flashy sports car through a crowded area - you get a lot of attention and everyone thinks "wow this person must be loaded". If that's your thing of course. Same reason why rich people open up their gardens and dining halls and art collections to the public from time to time - to show off.

This happened to me. The Greisinger Museum is basically a rich person showing off their hobby.

https://www.greisinger.museum/

I found it extremely interesting. Not because of the Tolkien lore but because it gave me a sneak peek into how someone really rich is living.

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#197
post #179

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What free software offers the enterprise features of Windows? AFAIK not even Red Hat is anywhere close to the central management features of Windows domains. Samba on Linux/Mac is severely backwards and using it is pain.

I think you'll find your experience here is outdated. There are a few good tools for managing Linux systems - puppeteer is one. What sorry if features are you missing? As for Samba, Gnome has good client built in to the file browser. But I'd have to ask why you're using Samba at all. There are much better network filesystems in the Linux world that don't come with all the legacy cruft and undocumented idiosyncrasies…

Samba - or to be precise MS AD is not just about files. On Linux it's limited to files and that's exactly the problem I'm talking about. On Mac it's at least able to share certificates and some basic settings now - still not ideal though.

Actually with modern clouds like OneDrive it's not about files at all, I haven't seen network drives being used for a decade. It's about privileges to various resources available within the corporate network and about what you can't do with your work computer, and about having the computer auto-configure to play with all the resources on corporate network.

It's about setting detailed access level based on AD groups - including user applications, not just networked drives or whatever. Permissions to CRM/ERP systems, document management systems etc. Detailed as much as "this user can only see contracts and invoices assigned to the London branch".

I open my computer and I immediately see the printer that's nearest to me as the first printer in the list. Access to it is authenticated and authorized (with no additional password prompts). I can simply choose a document from SharePoint and send it right there, walk over there and slap my chip card on it and have it printed. It's part of my system's print queue but if I switch computers in the meantime I can still work with the queue item there.

I scan a document and it goes directly to my OneDrive which is automatically connected to whatever computer I sit at as soon as I log in, regardless of me using a random terminal that's been sitting in whatever office I'm visiting.

I'm unable to break anything because there is no root to login to, nobody ever uses sudo on the computer, nobody ever needs admin privileges on it (harder to do with devs but common for all other professions). If an app needs to be added the computer is remotely reimaged from an image with the app added (this requires a one-setting change by the admin, nothing else). No user settings or files go missing in the process.

Corporate VPN, firewall, proxy servers, wifi network, wired network - all of it requires auth. The system just takes my user certificate and just works with it all by itself. Nothing is available without auth, nothing is unencrypted.

Building this kind of system with Microsoft products is as easy as installing a few apps on the corporate server machine. I literally learned how to do it when I was 12 and couldn't speak English yet.

Building it with Linux - well I am pretty skilled with Linux admin (as much as you'd expect someone who used it as their primary system for 15 years and hosts their own websites etc) but I can't even imagine where to begin.

Using puppeteer to connect to individual machines and turn options there - that's crazy. Enterprise Windows are fully declarative. And using separate systems to manage Windows/Mac and Linux - that's crazy. Apple is doing what it can to support MS AD - if Linux wants to be a special case, it's going to remain a special case.

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#198
Looking at the charter options, this could be an interesting american cabaret and folk music festival venue concept. Two or three nights via train, accoustic sets by performers, maybe configure couple of performance cars into the train then split performances over different cars at different times, so you can catch them in one of the cars and it spreads the audience over the train. Night stops in places with motels or camping to handle sleeping arrangements.

Just found some routes through the rockies, from moab to denver: https://www.rockymountaineer.com/routes_destinations , but a southwest one would be amazing.

Economics are running a cruise, but over land on a train, with some camping and motel options to scale it. Hmm...

Re: Privately-Owned Rail Cars

#200
post #122

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yeah, that's the "banned this practice" change that I was talking about. The documents in the link that the post is about are from 2021/2022 though. So they must have un-banned it. The "guidelines" document at https://www.amtrak.com/content/dam/projects/dotcom/english/p... lists 44 Amtrak stations throughout the US where this practice is allowed (and likely to continue to disrupt schedules for regular passengers). It…

I don't understand why Amtrak - the only operator on its own tracks - is unable to make it work, meanwhile in EU you have literally thousands of private operators operating their own trains as well as combined multi-owner trains riding on tracks belonging to dozens of owners... and it works fairly well, there certainly are no 6+ hours delays, at most an hour or so for the whole multi-state 1000km trip.

On the small portion of the US railway network that Amtrak owns, its quite successful, the Northeast Corridor is most likely profitable (and probably the only profitable part of the Amtrak system).
Post reply on HN