Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what exactly are “consumers” clamoring for that are not currently being delivered?
>> So what exactly are “consumers” clamoring for that are not currently being delivered? Until other choices are available, people tend to accept the default or keep on doing what was done in the past. There is a segment of consumers that would like choices beyond Apple and Google mobile operating systems: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2019/jul/04/c... https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/smartphones-…
> https://www.theguardian.com/technology/askjack/2019/jul/04/c...
Yes because using an operating system from the other 1 trillion dollar market cap company is going to be a better alternative. Meet the new boss…
> https://vivaldi.com/blog/technology/smartphones-5-alternativ...
And those alternatives are already out there and no one wants them in a first approximation to no one
> https://www.pcmag.com/picks/break-away-from-android-ios-7-fr...
Okay. So they are “out there to try”. Have the majority of users been clamoring for it?
> Personally, I would like to see more "convergence" devices that let the little computer I carry around with me be anything I want it to be: a programmable general purpose computer, a streaming media server, or whatever else I want.
And you are in the modernity and so much so that it wouldn’t be a profitable business. Do you think Microsoft is going to give you that?
> Walled gardens are not where innovation happens because the gardeners uproot whatever does not meet their vision.
Where are all of the “innovations” that the majority of people care about - or even enough to make a profitable business - on Android where you can sideload and have third party web browser engines?