Earlier quoted context omitted.
If your company had offered you the cash value of RSUs instead of the RSUs, would you not have ended up in the same position financially? For example, if your base pay was 200k, and you had a grant of RSUs worth 200k, how is that better financially than getting all 400k in cash?
If you have RSUs worth 200k per year, standard practice is that you get one grant of 800k at the start of employment, vesting over four years. If you got 200k cash instead, you couldn't buy 800k stock in the first year. That's an extra 600k of upside exposure. If that 600k of extra stock appreciates a lot in the first few years, you are far better off with the RSU grant. If it doesn't, you can quit before it vests an…
I am clearly working at the wrong company.