Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's a great perspective, but are those peeps writing the unused frameworks just wasting their time to solve a question nobody has asked? Take the D language, it's basically a poor man's Java, with a shoddy garbage collector and aspirations at being C/C++... Is that the work of heroes or the misguided?
Sorry, but D is a good idea and much closer to golang in my book, plus a lot earlier. They just didn't have the funding.
Wait, are you saying GPs description of D doesn't fit Go at least as well?