Live data from Hacker News

I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

jeffgeerling.com

191–199 of 199 posts

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#191
post #7

I get so frustrated with the idiotic thumbnails on youtube video these days. I am sure it's all optimized for the maximum number of clicks/views but if I see a still that looks the way it does at the bottom of this page I generally just don't watch it on principle.

YouTubers do what works. Blame the audience not the producers.

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#192
post #7

I get so frustrated with the idiotic thumbnails on youtube video these days. I am sure it's all optimized for the maximum number of clicks/views but if I see a still that looks the way it does at the bottom of this page I generally just don't watch it on principle.

Isn't it how YouTube works now? It's not 2005 anymore; Cringe thumbnail, Click-bait headline and more cringe in the Video is the standard operating procedure for someone who wants to make a YouTube career, eventually making enough revenue to do all that in a larger scale with Michael Bay movie budget.

There are very few left on YT who continue to make unedited video in the maker space[1][2] and obviously get punished by YT algorithms for that.

Cringe is part and parcel of YT, If we don't like it we should be watching videos on PeerTube, LBRY etc.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/c/MrTeslonian/videos

[2] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCv1xxFkEiAdCVy6foEEUIvw/vid...

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#193

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> an exaggerated face, a bit more than that Have you tested a difference between a regular expression (intrigued, skeptic, smiling...) and a goofy face? For science?

Yes. Goofy face always wins :( Though it gets an insane amount of backlash on HN (case in point: this thread).

I just wanted to thank you for replying so candidly and I did not mean to turn this post in a discussion about youtube thumbnails, your post otherwise was quite interesting!

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#194
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> a simple NAS device that is not much larger then drives it uses, but doesn't have Qnap OS installed on it. Well, you could just install your favorite Linux distro on a QNAP NAS device. Cost-wise the Pi-NAS option isn't even competitive if you aim for similar spec and form factor and packaging.

I can, but: a) it's hard to get support on the device when you can't provide any of the configuration dumps they ask (from their software) :) b) It is not even close to being comparable in price with NASes Jeff tests and shows on his videos and blogs. PiBox (currently on kickstarter) is $250 in a version that has a full solution, including case, pi, charger, LCD, OS, fan, board to connect regular 3.5" drives... It is…

Not sure about ARM-based NAS, but most x86-based QNAP NAS devices are basically a PC in hardware configuration with mature Linux support, so there's not really any support issue.

The PiBox case apparently can only house two 2.5" SATA drives, not regular 3.5" hard disks commonly used for cheap mass storage. 2.5" hard disks seem to peak at 5TB per drive so the potential capacity is limited unless you go with SSD at much much higher cost.

The PiBox's 15W power supply leaves very tight margin for its components: Pi4 peak power consumption is about 6.5W, two SATA SSDs will peak over 5W each as well, so you should watch for power for stable operation.

I couldn't find a 2.5" 2-bay NAS model so the form factor isn't identical, but the closest match is probably QNAP TS-230 w/ similar 4-core ARM A53 SoC supporting two 3.5" drives for $199. The obvious downside is that RAM is capped at 2GB and that might be a deal breaker if you want to run lots of apps, but for entry-level storage needs it should be sufficient.

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#195

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> an exaggerated face, a bit more than that Have you tested a difference between a regular expression (intrigued, skeptic, smiling...) and a goofy face? For science?

Yes. Goofy face always wins :( Though it gets an insane amount of backlash on HN (case in point: this thread).

[deleted]

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#196
post #142

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes. Goofy face always wins :( Though it gets an insane amount of backlash on HN (case in point: this thread).

Maybe both your observation and HN is right: the distribution is multi-modal in the sense that (presumably) there is a large majority of people where the thumbnail works for and views the content, and then there is a small (and possibly vocal) minority of people who absolutely hate it and treat it as an anti-signal. I know I belong in the latter group and will lose all interest in the video once I see the weird face…

This seems thoughtful and accurate, and reflects my own response to the video.

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#197
post #7

I get so frustrated with the idiotic thumbnails on youtube video these days. I am sure it's all optimized for the maximum number of clicks/views but if I see a still that looks the way it does at the bottom of this page I generally just don't watch it on principle.

I'm right there, with you. Even worse, are the ones where they outline the silhouette with a solid color.

Re: I built a $5k Raspberry Pi server (yes, it's ridiculous)

#199
post #188

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I can, but: a) it's hard to get support on the device when you can't provide any of the configuration dumps they ask (from their software) :) b) It is not even close to being comparable in price with NASes Jeff tests and shows on his videos and blogs. PiBox (currently on kickstarter) is $250 in a version that has a full solution, including case, pi, charger, LCD, OS, fan, board to connect regular 3.5" drives... It is…

Not sure about ARM-based NAS, but most x86-based QNAP NAS devices are basically a PC in hardware configuration with mature Linux support, so there's not really any support issue. The PiBox case apparently can only house two 2.5" SATA drives, not regular 3.5" hard disks commonly used for cheap mass storage. 2.5" hard disks seem to peak at 5TB per drive so the potential capacity is limited unless you go with SSD at muc…

PiBox with 2x3.5" is in the making, I'm actually waiting for it to be "released".

On Qnap and Linux - I'm not talking linux support. It... exists. I'm talking hardware product support. 2-3 years of warranty are standard in my region. But if I can't provide them with "proper" logs and allow them access using their software, they just won't investigate further.

Post reply on HN