Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

theverge.com

191–200 of 372 posts

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#191
post #127

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have to remind again, that iOS is a blackbox, closed source system. All this speculation applies also for a moment before they added anything. They might have had this code ready for years already. All we have is what they say. It is already very trivial to scan everything on on your device and send that metadata. Few lines of code. At the moment when they say about scanning everything in phone publicly without opt…

The difference is now every government knows too. They can't pretend they don't have the capability. And if they can scan for CP, why can't they scan for "whatever" else instead.

iOS has been running complex Neural Nets on all your images for years now. It powers all their social features and search.

Apple have always had the capability, and have been advertising it as central selling point of new versions of iOS for years. That ship sailed along time ago.

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#192
post #34
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It’s too late either way. The fact that it even got this far through implementation says the vendor is not on my side. Can Apple force people to install this even on devices they already sold?

If you don't use iCloud Photo Library or sync photos to the iCloud, none of this will apply to you. https://daringfireball.net/2021/08/apple_child_safety_initia...

> If you don't use iCloud Photo Library or sync photos to the iCloud, none of this will apply to you.

Not true. They will be scanning your messages also for inappropriate content - https://www.apple.com/child-safety/

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#193
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It’s too late either way. The fact that it even got this far through implementation says the vendor is not on my side. Not only that once capability is revealed it can be required by governments and manipulated under warrant. Particularly in some regimes, mine included, the vendor can be compelled to do something and not say anything. My comment doesn’t even cover how monumentally flawed the entire thing is either. S…

Even Apple Music has gone to shit. iTunes keeps managing to get worse and worse, and they're pushing hard to pretend you don't have your own collection to get you to buy into the subscription model. At this point I'm going back to owning a seaparate dedicated music device that is totally divorced from the computer. There's just something intentional about walking over to a CD player or record player, picking out an a…

https://www.navidrome.org/ might help

(I'm unaffiliated, just sharing)

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#194

I'm in two minds about this Apple news. In one part, the pro-privacy part of me is of course aghast at the whole idea. However... If you "read the room", there have been increasing noises from the global political world in recent years, and perhaps especially in the US. So if you think about it that way, it might be a case of Apple jumping before they were pushed. I mean, let's face it, if you wait for the politicos…

> let's face it, if you wait for the politicos to come up with a solution and force it through with legislation, they really would put in actual backdoors and encryption bans given half the chance. They've tried to do this for decades and have failed. If they're going to do it then let it be on record. Let's see how voters like it.

90% of the voters are too stupid or probably don't even know what encryption is. Many are also going to stick to party lines. It just matters whether the 10% swing voters will care about this issue *more than* the other awful things the leadership is doing.

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#195
post #61

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Might look into pinephone or something similar." Pinephone is my hope, too, but do not expect anything stable soon. That will take some time, probably years. It does not happen on its own, though, they need support now to make it a real alternative and not just a tinker toy.

There's like three major options if you want to run a FOSS smartphone, and I'll sum them up. Pinephone: Cheap. The device isn't very powerful. With people coming from an Apple device, that's a problem. Fairphone 3: Fair. The hardware isn't very powerful either, and the device is more expensive, but the product is better for the people who assembled it and the environment. Librem 5: Open. Even more expensive than Fair…

If one is okay with less-open hardware, the F(x)tec Pro 1 X seems to be a good higher-end smartphone that has a decent camera sensor, slide-out keyboard, AMOLED display, and can be ordered with either Ubuntu Touch or Lineage preinstalled.

It's at the top of my if-I-ever-jump-ship-from-Apple list of phones.

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#196
post #64
post #35

So I was ignorant on the issue and completely against the approach of Apple. Then HN taught me that any company storing images on their infrastructure in the US must report pedophilic images to the US government. At this point, the approach taken by Apple seems like the best one to me, if you don't want to store pictures in clear on your servers. What other technical approach are people advocating for? Another point…

Do mandatory reporter laws work like that? I was under the impression that you had to report something if you saw it , but you had no obligation to be actively scanning or to compromise encryption to do so. For example, I don’t think S3 does any active scanning and you can definitely shove any encrypted blob you want onto their servers with no obligation to give them a decryption key. IMO this appears to be Apple eit…

I think you have to be aware of what is happening, before you can say that nothing criminal happens. This is where scanning steps in. You can’t turn blind eye.

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#197
post #3

I really hope there is enough momentum to stop this. It's definitely the last straw for me in terms of apple products. I haven't bought a new iphone for 4 years, I'm slowly trying to switch to a lightphone (non smartphone). My mac needs a change but I will probably switch to linux. It's absolutely ridiculous what apple has become. The exact opposite of what they used to represent, when I loved them. God rest Steve Jo…

[deleted]

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#198
post #84

I'm in two minds about this Apple news. In one part, the pro-privacy part of me is of course aghast at the whole idea. However... If you "read the room", there have been increasing noises from the global political world in recent years, and perhaps especially in the US. So if you think about it that way, it might be a case of Apple jumping before they were pushed. I mean, let's face it, if you wait for the politicos…

> There's always GPG and a whole litany of other tools and apps for those who know what they are doing in terms of privacy. And it's always there also for whoever they claim to want to catch, so this measure is useless. This is not protecting anyone, Apple might very well be anticipating the regulation, but that does not automatically deserve our praise. We should fight against this implementation and any regulation…

> And it's always there also for whoever they claim to want to catch, so this measure is useless.

Right. This will, a) catch the low hanging fruit type of criminal and b) keep honest people honest while forcing them to give up something for nothing.

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#199

Earlier quoted context omitted.

So, you trust Apple to install this spyware and only use it in the way they currently describe. Great! But what happens the second they get an order from $GOVERNMENT that tells them to use the spyware to also look at other documents on the device? I think it's pretty obvious what Apple will say. They'll say "OK." They have no plausible deniability to tell $GOVERNMENT to go pound sand - they have demonstrated the capa…

They could have done what you describe at any time in history. This doesn't change anything in that regard. Either you trust Apple enough to use their products or you don't.

So I guess the answer is “don’t”.

Re: WhatsApp lead and other tech experts fire back at Apple’s Child Safety plan

#200
post #155

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Those laws do not exist (yet?). You can’t justify this as a compliance measure for legislation that does not exist.

Yes, but current laws also restrict storing images as E2E encrypted, so there is dilemma?

Where are you getting this from? That’s simply not true. It’s perfectly legal to “store images as E2E encrypted”
Post reply on HN